2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of an Evidence-Based Mobility Intervention on the Level of Function in Acute Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients on a Neurointensive Care Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 13 ] It is noteworthy to mention that the term “mobilization” is used in different contexts by various authors. Some authors consider mobilization as orienting the patient to upright position[ 2 19 24 ] and ambulation whereas some consider it as any movement that is plausible. [ 3 6 25 ] It is found that patients receiving active assisted mobilization have better outcomes than patients receiving passive mobilization,[ 22 ] and some authors consider only active movements as mobilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 ] It is noteworthy to mention that the term “mobilization” is used in different contexts by various authors. Some authors consider mobilization as orienting the patient to upright position[ 2 19 24 ] and ambulation whereas some consider it as any movement that is plausible. [ 3 6 25 ] It is found that patients receiving active assisted mobilization have better outcomes than patients receiving passive mobilization,[ 22 ] and some authors consider only active movements as mobilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these studies found a very low incidence of adverse events associated with early mobilisation, patients demonstrating a deterioration in neurological status or signs of vasospasm on screening were not mobilised. There have also been studies indicating early mobilisation to be associated with improved functional outcomes in older adults with low Hunt and Hess grades (Shimamura et al, 2014) and in a mixed intracerebral haemorrhage and aSAH patient population (Rand & Darbinian, 2015), however, when Karic and colleagues (2016) examined the long-term effect of early rehabilitation, they found that there was no significant difference in functional outcomes at one year when an early mobilisation and control group were compared. It did however find that early mobilisation increased the chance of a good functional outcome in patients with aSAH who had high severity scores (WFNS grade 3-5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical therapy interventions in acute stages of ICH and in patients with severe motor deficit are based on passive mobilization (passive musculoskeletal intervention): range of motion, positioning (to promote joint anatomic alignment), transfer techniques [16]. In subacute stages of ICH, active musculoskeletal interventions are initiated, focused on using and strengthening the affected limb, on symmetric weight bearing and transfer activities, and on gait training or ambulation with assistive devices.…”
Section: Physical Therapy In Ichmentioning
confidence: 99%