Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the influence of alternative erasing times of DenOptixH (Dentsply/ Gendex, Chicargo, IL) digital plates on subjective image quality and the probability of double exposure image not occurring. Methods: Human teeth were X-rayed with phosphor plates using ten different erasing times. Two observers evaluated the images for subjective image quality (sharpness, brightness, contrast, enamel definition, dentin definition and dentin-enamel junction definition) and for the presence or absence of d… Show more
“…12,18,19 After evaluating the effect of different erasing times on proximal caries diagnosis, Melo et al 12 reported no significant difference in both pixel intensity values and diagnostic accuracy of observers. Since the effect of various erasing times was tested, the methods of the former and the presented study were basically not the same; therefore, the comparison of the results may not be relevant.…”
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine (1) the effect of various scan delays on pixel intensity measurements and (2) the diagnostic accuracy of occlusal caries detection. Methods: 72 non-cavitated extracted human permanent molar teeth with sound and carious occlusal surfaces were radiographed using the DIGORAH storage phosphor plates (SPPs) (Soredex Corporation, Helsinki, Finland). Plates were scanned immediately and 10 min, 30 min, 60 min and 120 min after exposure. Three different plates were used for each scan delay. An aluminium (Al) wedge was used to evaluate the change in mean grey values (MGVs) for scan delays. Diagnostic accuracy for occlusal caries detection was performed by scoring all the digital images. The true presence of caries was determined by stereomicroscopy. Comparison of MGVs of the Al wedge for immediate and delayed scans was made using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer tests. The accuracy was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (A z ). A z s were compared using two-way ANOVA and t-tests. Kappa was used to measure inter and intraobserver agreement. Results: The mean A z s of immediately scanned plates were higher than the A z s of plates scanned with four different delays (p , 0.05). The A z of immediately scanned images was significantly higher than the A z s of images with 60 min and 120 min scan delays (p , 0.05) but not for 10 min and 30 min delays (p . 0.05). MGVs of immediately scanned plates were significantly higher than the plates scanned with four different delays (p , 0.05). Agreement decreased with increasing scan delays. Conclusion: Scanning of DIGORA SPPs should not be delayed beyond 30 min for accurate occlusal caries diagnosis.
“…12,18,19 After evaluating the effect of different erasing times on proximal caries diagnosis, Melo et al 12 reported no significant difference in both pixel intensity values and diagnostic accuracy of observers. Since the effect of various erasing times was tested, the methods of the former and the presented study were basically not the same; therefore, the comparison of the results may not be relevant.…”
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine (1) the effect of various scan delays on pixel intensity measurements and (2) the diagnostic accuracy of occlusal caries detection. Methods: 72 non-cavitated extracted human permanent molar teeth with sound and carious occlusal surfaces were radiographed using the DIGORAH storage phosphor plates (SPPs) (Soredex Corporation, Helsinki, Finland). Plates were scanned immediately and 10 min, 30 min, 60 min and 120 min after exposure. Three different plates were used for each scan delay. An aluminium (Al) wedge was used to evaluate the change in mean grey values (MGVs) for scan delays. Diagnostic accuracy for occlusal caries detection was performed by scoring all the digital images. The true presence of caries was determined by stereomicroscopy. Comparison of MGVs of the Al wedge for immediate and delayed scans was made using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer tests. The accuracy was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (A z ). A z s were compared using two-way ANOVA and t-tests. Kappa was used to measure inter and intraobserver agreement. Results: The mean A z s of immediately scanned plates were higher than the A z s of plates scanned with four different delays (p , 0.05). The A z of immediately scanned images was significantly higher than the A z s of images with 60 min and 120 min scan delays (p , 0.05) but not for 10 min and 30 min delays (p . 0.05). MGVs of immediately scanned plates were significantly higher than the plates scanned with four different delays (p , 0.05). Agreement decreased with increasing scan delays. Conclusion: Scanning of DIGORA SPPs should not be delayed beyond 30 min for accurate occlusal caries diagnosis.
“…Some recent studies [16,21,23] evaluated the effect of different times of erasing data from PSPs on the quality of inter-proximal caries detection; Melo reported no effect on caries detection ability [16]. Result comparison between Melo's study and our study regarding this matter is not feasible due to fundamental and structural differences.…”
Section: Fig 1 Sample Teeth In Contact Mounted In a Silicone Block mentioning
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different scan delays and different kVps on the diagnostic accuracy of inter-proximal caries detection in photostimulable phosphor plates (PSPs).
Materials and Methods: 45 non-cavitated extracted human posterior teeth were radiographed using the DIGORA® PSPs (Soredex Corporation, Helsinki, Finland). The plates were exposed at 60 kVp and 70 kVp were scanned immediately, 10 min, 30 min, 1h, 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after exposure. In between the exposure and the scan period, the plates were stored in light-tight boxes. The true presence of caries was determined by sectioning the teeth mesiodistally. The accuracy was expressed as the area under ROC curve (AZ). The AZs were compared using SPSS version17 software and repeated measurement test. Kappa was used to measure inter and intra observer agreement.
Results: There was no significant difference between caries detection AZs of the images that were scanned immediately and within 30 min after exposure at 60 kVp and 70 kVp (P >0.05). The immediately scanned AZ at 60 kVp was significantly higher than the AZs with 6 h, 24 h and 48 h scan delays (P <0.05). the immediately scanned AZ at 70Kvp was significantly higher than the AZs of 1 h, 6 h, 24 h and 48 h (P <0.05).
Conclusions: PSP scanning should not be delayed higher than 30 min in order to have an accurate proximal caries detection. Longer delays may cause loss of quality of images.
“…26 Silme süresinin değerlendirildiği farklı çalıĢmalar olmakla birlikte Melo ve ark. 29 plakların en az 25 saniye süreyle 1700 lux ıĢığa maruz bırakılması gerektiğini bildirmiĢlerdir. Bu sürenin altındaki uygulamalarda görüntünün kontrast, parlaklık, keskinliğinin azaldığı, mine, dentin ve mine-dentin sınırının net izlenemediği ve görüntüde "çift görüntü" oluĢtuğu rapor edilmiĢtir.…”
Section: Tarama ġģLemiunclassified
“…Bu sürenin altındaki uygulamalarda görüntünün kontrast, parlaklık, keskinliğinin azaldığı, mine, dentin ve mine-dentin sınırının net izlenemediği ve görüntüde "çift görüntü" oluĢtuğu rapor edilmiĢtir. 29 Tarayıcıya bağlı olarak, görüntüde fazladan horizontal beyaz çizgi oluĢması, tarama parametrelerinin optimal olmasına karĢılık görüntünün çok parlak olması (ġekil 3), ekranda görüntünün sadece bir kısmının oluĢması, görüntü boyutunun küçülmesi, farklı iki görüntünün süperpoze olması (ġekil 4) gibi artefaktlar oluĢabilir. Bu gibi durumlarda plaklar taranırken silinmemiĢse aynı plak yeniden tarandığında görüntünün düzgün bir Ģekilde elde edildiği bildirilmiĢtir.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.