2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2019.106670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of alloying elements on the γ’ antiphase boundary energy in Ni-base superalloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This energy per unit area of interface was referred to as APB energy, γ APB , and it could be isotropic or anisotropic [78,86]. This APB energy was calculated based on the energy differences solely due to the defect between the APB and the non-APB pristine atomic structures [87]. The APB energy was the defect formation energy per unit area and was expressed in Equation (3) [87]:…”
Section: Discussion Of Spatial Configuration Arrangements and Lattice...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This energy per unit area of interface was referred to as APB energy, γ APB , and it could be isotropic or anisotropic [78,86]. This APB energy was calculated based on the energy differences solely due to the defect between the APB and the non-APB pristine atomic structures [87]. The APB energy was the defect formation energy per unit area and was expressed in Equation (3) [87]:…”
Section: Discussion Of Spatial Configuration Arrangements and Lattice...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This APB energy was calculated based on the energy differences solely due to the defect between the APB and the non-APB pristine atomic structures [87]. The APB energy was the defect formation energy per unit area and was expressed in Equation (3) [87]:…”
Section: Discussion Of Spatial Configuration Arrangements and Lattice...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the mismatch parameter between γ/γ′ is closely related to the chemical composition, especially the content of elements such as Ni, Al, Cr, Co, Ti, or Mo, which are dissolved in the aforementioned phases with different at % concentrations. Dodaran et al [ 57 ] noted changes in the at % fraction of elements: Al from 2.56 at % and 5.6 at %, where the Al content in the γ′-phase changes from 8.58 at % to 12.25 at %; Ti of 2.0 at % and 5.5 at %, where the Ti content in the γ′-phase changes from 8.5 at % to 12.7 at %; Cr from 9.0 at % and 26.5 at %, where the Cr content in the γ′-phase changes from 1.06 at % to 1.67 at %; and Co from 14.2 at % and 36.0 at %, where the Co content in the γ′-phase changes from 5.1 at % to 16.25 at %. They further stated that the elements Ti, Cr, and Mo in the ternary system Ni–Al–X dissolve in substitution and tend to replace Al atoms in the Ni 3 Al γ′-phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the present work, the APB energy was calculated to 0.163 J/m 2 from the ratio of Al and Ti in the precipitates by a model for a Fe-Ni-Cr alloy [ 44 ], which might not precisely fit CCAs. In this model, Co is not considered for increasing the APB energy, as suggested in work dealing with IN939 [ 82 ]. Moreover, even for the APB energy of the pure Ni 3 Al phase, there is a significant variation in the literature [ 83 ], leading to an uncertainty of the exact value and justifying slight changes in the original value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%