2016
DOI: 10.3788/yjyxs20163101.0062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of aligning layer parameters on response time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AO system is now considered to be an essential setup of many new large aperture optical telescopes. [3,4] In traditional adaptive optics, the distortion is measured by a wavefront sensor (WFS) and corrected by a wavefront corrector (WFC), such as a deformable mirror (DM) [5] or liquid crystal wavefront corrector (LCWC), [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] conjugated to the telescope pupil. [14,15] Unfortunately, this approach only achieves a good imaging resolution within a limited field of view (FOV) smaller than the isoplanatic angle that is generally only a few arc-seconds at visible wavelengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AO system is now considered to be an essential setup of many new large aperture optical telescopes. [3,4] In traditional adaptive optics, the distortion is measured by a wavefront sensor (WFS) and corrected by a wavefront corrector (WFC), such as a deformable mirror (DM) [5] or liquid crystal wavefront corrector (LCWC), [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] conjugated to the telescope pupil. [14,15] Unfortunately, this approach only achieves a good imaging resolution within a limited field of view (FOV) smaller than the isoplanatic angle that is generally only a few arc-seconds at visible wavelengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%