2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-020-01609-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ACQ treatment on surface quality and bonding performance of four Malaysian hardwoods and cross laminated timber (CLT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Pang et al (2017) investigating the effect of incising on the resistance of ACQ concluded that the service life of ACQ treated wood be more than 50 years based on leaching test results. More recently, Adnan et al (2021) investigated the impact of ACQ treatment on surface quality and bonding performance of hardwood and CLT elements. The results showed that ACQ treatment does not affect block shear and strength of hardwoods and CLT samples.…”
Section: Copper Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Pang et al (2017) investigating the effect of incising on the resistance of ACQ concluded that the service life of ACQ treated wood be more than 50 years based on leaching test results. More recently, Adnan et al (2021) investigated the impact of ACQ treatment on surface quality and bonding performance of hardwood and CLT elements. The results showed that ACQ treatment does not affect block shear and strength of hardwoods and CLT samples.…”
Section: Copper Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are important reports from Malaysia [22] and Brazil [23,24]. The properties of CLT panels of Falcataria moluccana, Anthocephalus macrophyllus, Acacia magnium, hybrid acacia (A. mangium × A. auriculiformis), Paraserianthes falcataria, Endospermum malaccensis, Hevea brasiliensis, Canarium sp., Intsia bijuga, plus several eucalyptus species, have been studied [22,[25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional vacuum pressure treatment is not possible for panels that are too large to t in currently available commercial wood treatment cylinders. Dip treating mass timber elements could result in limited penetration and retention levels because of the low surface area to volume ratios (Adnan et al, 2021;Bagheri et al, 2022). It may be possible to pre-treat the lamellae with preservatives (Lim et al, 2020), but this would require the redrying of the lumber and the generation of treated wood waste when the lamellae are planed before bonding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%