1992
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/56.3.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a zinc-fortified formula on immunocompetence and growth of malnourished infants

Abstract: This study attempted to define the possible contribution of zinc nutrition to immunocompetence and growth in severely malnourished infants. The effect of zinc supplementation was evaluated in marasmic infants during nutritional rehabilitation by using a controlled double-blind design in which 19 infants fed a zinc-fortified formula were compared with 20 infants fed the same non-supplemented formula. Evaluation of immunocompetence, growth, and zinc, copper, and iron status was performed on admission and at 30, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
98
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous studies have detected growth differences between zinc supplemented and control groups with similar or smaller sample sizes (Walravens et al, 1976(Walravens et al, , 1983(Walravens et al, , 1989(Walravens et al, , 1992Gibson et al, 1989;Castillo-Duran et al, 1987Schlesinger et al, 1992;Nakamura et al, 1993;Shrivastava et al, 1993), and this difference was detected within three months in some cases. However, we found no signi®cant effects of zinc supplementation on growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several previous studies have detected growth differences between zinc supplemented and control groups with similar or smaller sample sizes (Walravens et al, 1976(Walravens et al, , 1983(Walravens et al, , 1989(Walravens et al, , 1992Gibson et al, 1989;Castillo-Duran et al, 1987Schlesinger et al, 1992;Nakamura et al, 1993;Shrivastava et al, 1993), and this difference was detected within three months in some cases. However, we found no signi®cant effects of zinc supplementation on growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the effect of zinc supplementation on growth is unclear. Several studies have been carried out worldwide and many of these showed a positive effect of zinc supplementation on growth among groups of children who were nutritionally disadvantaged in some way, including stunted children (Walravens & Hambridge, 1976;Walravens et al, 1983Walravens et al, , 1989Nakamura et al, 1993), and in particular among malnourished children (Golden & Golden, 1981;Castillo-Duran et al, 1987;Schlesinger et al, 1992;Shrivastava et al, 1993;Ninh et al, 1996). However, different anthropometric parameters were affected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive association of dietary zinc intake with weight velocity from 6 to 12 months is not surprising considering the importance of zinc for growth (Brown et al, 1998b;Schlesinger et al, 1992). Among the study infants given the vitamin ± mineral forti®ed weanimix (WM), this food contributed about 89% of their total zinc intake from complementary foods; in the other three groups (W, WF and KF), the unforti®ed project foods contributed 66% of the zinc intake from foods.…”
Section: Growth Predictors Of Ghanaian Infantsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thirteen trials [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] were included that investigated the efficacy of treatments for correcting micronutrient deficiencies in children with SAM. Any supplements or combinations of supplements were eligible for inclusion, providing other review inclusion criteria (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported outcomes) were met. Within this section, 10 trials [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] (12 publications Quantity and quality of research available: zinc A summary of the key characteristics of the 10 trials [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] can be seen in Table 51, with further details of the trials in Appendix 12. Three trials took place in Bangladesh, 68,69,73,77 two in India, 72,78 and one trial each in Pakistan, 79 Kenya, 70 Jamaica, 71 South Africa 74,75 and Chile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%