2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of growth from 1 to 18 months among breast-fed Ghanaian infants

Abstract: Objective: To examine factors associated with the physical growth of breast-fed Ghanaian infants during the ®rst 18 months of life. Design: A community-based longitudinal study. Setting: The study was carried out in Techiman, a district capital and major food trading center in the Brong Ahafo region of Ghana. Subjects: One-month old infants n 216 with birth weight ! 2X5 kg were recruited from Maternal and Child Health Centers. Method: From 6 to 12 months, infants were provided with one of four types of nutriti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Frongillo and Habicht (1997) suggested that this study understated the potential for exclusive breastfeeding to reduce diarrheal disease, as the complementary foods supplied were hygienic, unlike complementary foods given during uncontrolled, unsanitary weaning conditions. A longitudinal study in Ghana documented that infants who had a term of EBF for less than 6 months had no growth advantage relative to those infants EBF for at least 6 months (Lartey et al, 2000). Correspondingly, the introduction of complementary foods between 4-6 months to infants had no significant effect on growth in research by others (Kusin et al, 1991;Martines et al, 1994;Simondon et al, 1996;Zumrawi et al, 1987).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Populationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frongillo and Habicht (1997) suggested that this study understated the potential for exclusive breastfeeding to reduce diarrheal disease, as the complementary foods supplied were hygienic, unlike complementary foods given during uncontrolled, unsanitary weaning conditions. A longitudinal study in Ghana documented that infants who had a term of EBF for less than 6 months had no growth advantage relative to those infants EBF for at least 6 months (Lartey et al, 2000). Correspondingly, the introduction of complementary foods between 4-6 months to infants had no significant effect on growth in research by others (Kusin et al, 1991;Martines et al, 1994;Simondon et al, 1996;Zumrawi et al, 1987).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Populationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If these children are already malnourished as a result of a longer duration of EBF, the potentiating effects of the cycle of infection and malnutrition could take hold, possibly explaining why these children do not have a lower infant and child mortality rate relative to those who are EBF for less than 6 months. Following Cohen et al (1994, Dewey et al (1999), Lartey et al (2000), Moffat (2001), and others, we attempted to evaluate the relationship between term of EBF on infant and child welfare. In particular, we considered the impact of term of EBF on infant and child mortality.…”
Section: Why Introduce Complementary Foods?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific characteristics of the population frame of reference are an important metric. For example, significant effects on infant size for age are due to factors ranging from genetic predisposition to biological age (gestational age in young infants) (Casey et al, 1991), feeding style (Dewey, 1998), illness (Waterlow, 1994), and altitude (Haas et al, 1982), in addition to broader lifestyle variables such as socioeconomic level (Victora et al, 1987) and maternal education (Lartey et al, 2000), as these mediate availability to the infant of resources ranging from nutrition to health care. Thus a conclusion of ''small for age,'' ''large for age,'' or ''appropriate for age'' for any single individual is entirely contingent on the nature of the comparative framework.…”
Section: Growth Standards Document Individual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Hautvast et al 23 e Lartey et al 24 . Entretanto, o efeito da suplementação com vitamina A, anteriormente relatado, é questionável devido aos resultados de experimentos mais recentes que desvendam impacto positivo [25][26][27] .…”
unclassified
“…Trabalho de cunho prospectivo randomizado com criancas brasileiras 30 revelou que, apesar do tratamento com vitamina A mostrar-se eficaz no parasitismo, esse efeito nao atingiu o peso nem a altura. Em Gana 24 , a associação entre as concentrações de retinol e o crescimento em crianças de 1 a 18 meses amamentadas não foi encontrada. Na Colômbia 20 , o deficit ponderal mostrou-se associado à deficiencia de vitamina A, contrariamente ao resultado mostrado para o deficit de altura.…”
unclassified