2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbr.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efetividade da infiltração intra-articular guiada por imagem: comparação entre fluoroscopia e ultrassom

Abstract: Imaging-guided IAI improves regional pain in patients with various types of synovitis in the short term. For the vast majority of variables, no significant difference in terms of effectiveness was observed between fluoroscopy and ultrasound guided IAI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it has been shown that no significant difference in terms of effectiveness between fluoroscopy and ultrasound-guided corticosteroid hip injection [19], Byrd, et al [20] reported that ultrasound-guided injections were less painful and preferred by patients.…”
Section: Ultrasound-guided Injection For Specific Anatomic Hip and Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it has been shown that no significant difference in terms of effectiveness between fluoroscopy and ultrasound-guided corticosteroid hip injection [19], Byrd, et al [20] reported that ultrasound-guided injections were less painful and preferred by patients.…”
Section: Ultrasound-guided Injection For Specific Anatomic Hip and Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the needle injection reaches 26.8%, even by a skilled operator under optimal conditions without an imaging guide [3]. Fluoroscopy (FL) or ultrasonography (US) can be helpful in determining the needle position in the tissue, and it has been seen that the accuracy of image-guided needle injection is better than blind injection [5,6,7,8,9]. However, FL-guided injection is accompanied with radiation exposure, and the visualization of soft tissues such as nerves or blood vessels is limited [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ultrasound is non-invasive and does not cause discomfort to patients, it is cheap, and widely accessible [ 7 ]. Also, ultrasound can assess of synovitis by quantifying the thickening of the synovial membrane [ 8 ], including targeted tendon sheaths, bursae, and joints [ 9 ] by B-mode (grey-scale) ultrasound [ 10 ]. Ultrasound has site-specific sensitivity [ 11 ], and has been reported to have 44% sensitivity and 99% specificity, which compare favorably with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is considered to be the ‘gold-standard’ method for evaluating tenosynovitis in RA [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%