2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69162012000300003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito das condições ambientais no nível de ruído emitido por leitões

Abstract: RESUMO:Objetivou-se, com este trabalho, avaliar a influência das variáveis ambientais nos níveis de ruídos emitidos por suínos e quantificar as faixas em dB comparativamente às condições de conforto térmico estabelecidas pela literatura. O experimento foi conduzido em câmara climática, onde foram alojados cinco leitões em fase de creche, submetidos à variação na temperatura ambiente de 20°C a 38°C e umidade relativa de 50% a 80%. Decibelímetros foram instalados para o registro dos níveis de ruídos e sensores d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the relative humidity of the air happens as a function of air temperature, the higher the air temperature is, the greater will be the air capacity to retain the water vapor, without affecting the thermoregulation and performance of the piglets (Barros et al, 2015). The relative air humidity did not reach the comfort range of 50-70%, recommended by Miranda et al (2012) in both treatments. According to Huynh et al (2005), the daily weight gain of piglets is impaired when the combination of high temperature and high relative humidity occurs which was not observed in this experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Since the relative humidity of the air happens as a function of air temperature, the higher the air temperature is, the greater will be the air capacity to retain the water vapor, without affecting the thermoregulation and performance of the piglets (Barros et al, 2015). The relative air humidity did not reach the comfort range of 50-70%, recommended by Miranda et al (2012) in both treatments. According to Huynh et al (2005), the daily weight gain of piglets is impaired when the combination of high temperature and high relative humidity occurs which was not observed in this experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…9, No. 4; AH was negatively correlated with RR (-0.34), HR (-0.37) and RT (-0.42), demonstrating that the animals activated their thermoregulatory mechanisms to a greater extent, as a reductionin the percentage of air moisture occurred, a result similar to AT (-0.82), but in the opposite direction, indicating that the increase in temperature caused a reduction of humidity, with AH values lower than 50% being considered uncomfortable for animals in nursery stage (Miranda et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Regarding the AH, the afternoon shift had less (p > 0.05) amount of water in the air, possibly because of the AT having achieved an average temperature of 36.22 ºC, thus rendering a dryer and uncomfortable air to breath. Miranda et al (2012), working with pigs in nursery stage, considered that AH should remain between 50-70%, with the optimal value for this breeding stage being of 70%, according to Lima et al (2011). Figure 01 shows the existence of this BGHI variation observed between the morning and afternoon shifts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management process speed may cause stress for animals during truck loading, travelling and unloading operations (LUDTKE et al, 2012). Assessing this stress may further help reducing the losses (CORDEIRO et al, 2012;MIRANDA et al, 2012). According to EMBRAPA (2012), after three-hour trip, animals require especial attention as they get very stressed, which can be further damaged by fasting.…”
Section: Pre-slaughter Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%