2016
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4162-8957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito da temperatura e do tempo de armazenamento de amostras de leite cru nos resultados das análises eletrônicas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…CASSOLI et al (2010) andCASSOLI et al (2007) reported that bacterial counts were not affected until Day 7, with samples remaining analytically viable when the storage temperature was 7 °C. Similar findings were obtained by SOUZA et al (2006) at temperatures between 3.8 °C and 10 °C and by ZENI (2014) at 10 °C. However, SESKENA & JANKEVICA (2007), GONZALO et al (2003), and NINANE et al (2000 have suggested that samples could be analyzed only until the 4th day after collection when refrigerated at 4 °C.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CASSOLI et al (2010) andCASSOLI et al (2007) reported that bacterial counts were not affected until Day 7, with samples remaining analytically viable when the storage temperature was 7 °C. Similar findings were obtained by SOUZA et al (2006) at temperatures between 3.8 °C and 10 °C and by ZENI (2014) at 10 °C. However, SESKENA & JANKEVICA (2007), GONZALO et al (2003), and NINANE et al (2000 have suggested that samples could be analyzed only until the 4th day after collection when refrigerated at 4 °C.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…MARTINS et al (2009) argued that the bacteriostatic effect of azidiol is influenced by the temperature at which the raw milk samples are stored, meaning the efficiency of this preservative depends on storage temperature. However, ALMEIDA et al (2016) andSOUZA et al (2006) observed no differences between samples stored at temperatures from 3 °C to 11 °C and from 3.8 °C to 10 °C, respectively. In addition, ELIZONDO et al (2005) used preservative efficacy tests to evaluate different doses of liquid azidiol for sample preservation and reported no difference between the usual concentration used and a half dose of the preservative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The evaporation of water, the main constituent of milk, probably also occurred throughout the storage period, resulting in a higher lactose content due to the concentration effect of the constituents. It should be noted that electronic equipment used for compositional analyses have acceptability limits for the repeatability standard deviation of 0.06%for protein, fat and lactose and 0.1% for total solid sand defatted solids (ALMEIDA et al, 2016). Ordóñez (2005) and Tronco (2013) found a reduction in lactose content with increasing storage time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para su producción, la industria requiere leche con conteos bacteriales bajos alrededor de 100000 a 300 000 UFC/ml (Belli, 2013;Botaro, Gameiro y Santos, 2013;MAGAP, 2013), dado que algunas esporas, enzimas y metabolitos bacteriales pueden sobrevivir a procesos térmicos y afectar las características sensoriales de los productos alimenticios como el sabor, textura o reducción de su vida útil (Barbano, Ma y Santos, 2006;Silva, 2010;Gopal, 2015). Además, los altos conteos de bacterias en leche cruda pueden ser alertas de deficiencias en la higiene y desinfección en las áreas de producción y procedimientos de ordeño, en materiales o equipos; así como errores en el control de la temperatura de almacenamiento y la calidad microbiológica del agua utilizada, entre otras (Matsubara, 2011;Ruiz-Cortés y col., 2012;Almeida, 2016;Reyes, 2017). El conteo en placas microbiológicas es el método de referencia para el análisis del CTB.…”
Section: Conclusiónunclassified