2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2010.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efectos del entrenamiento en estrategias de regulación emocional en el bienestar de cuidadores de enfermos de Alzheimer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative to the comparator groups, depression was not significantly reduced by individual CBT, but was by group formats; SMD=-0.04; 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.21; p=0.76 (Losada et al, 2015; and SMD=-0.45; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.30; p<0.001 (Arango-Lasprilla et al, 2014;Coon et al, 2003;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2003;Gendron et al, 1996;Losada-Baltar et al, 2004;Losada et al, 2011Losada et al, , 2005Márquez-González et al, 2007), respectively. This finding was similar for stress; individual CBT did not lead to statistically significant reductions relative to comparators (SMD=-0.20; 95% CI: -0.54 to 0.14; p=0.26) (Bourgeois et al, 2002;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2007;Quayhagen et al, 2000), whereas group CBT did (SMD=-0.41; 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.23; p<0.001) (Arango-Lasprilla et al, 2014; Etxeberria- Etxeberria Arritxabal et al, 2014;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2008;Losada-Baltar et al, 2004;Losada et al, 2005). Neither individual nor group CBT significantly reduced caregivers' anxiety, relative to a comparator treatment; SMD=0.14; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.33; p=0.14 (Bourgeois et al, 2002;Gonyea et al, 2016;Livingston et al, 2013;Losada et al, 2015;Quayhagen et al, 2000) and SMD=0.00; 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.58; p=0.99 (Akkerman & Ostwald, 2004;Gendron et al, 1996;Gonyea et al, 2016;Gonzalez et al, 2014;Hébert et al, 2003;Passoni et al, 2014), respectively.…”
Section: Individual Versus Group Cbtmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relative to the comparator groups, depression was not significantly reduced by individual CBT, but was by group formats; SMD=-0.04; 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.21; p=0.76 (Losada et al, 2015; and SMD=-0.45; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.30; p<0.001 (Arango-Lasprilla et al, 2014;Coon et al, 2003;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2003;Gendron et al, 1996;Losada-Baltar et al, 2004;Losada et al, 2011Losada et al, , 2005Márquez-González et al, 2007), respectively. This finding was similar for stress; individual CBT did not lead to statistically significant reductions relative to comparators (SMD=-0.20; 95% CI: -0.54 to 0.14; p=0.26) (Bourgeois et al, 2002;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2007;Quayhagen et al, 2000), whereas group CBT did (SMD=-0.41; 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.23; p<0.001) (Arango-Lasprilla et al, 2014; Etxeberria- Etxeberria Arritxabal et al, 2014;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2008;Losada-Baltar et al, 2004;Losada et al, 2005). Neither individual nor group CBT significantly reduced caregivers' anxiety, relative to a comparator treatment; SMD=0.14; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.33; p=0.14 (Bourgeois et al, 2002;Gonyea et al, 2016;Livingston et al, 2013;Losada et al, 2015;Quayhagen et al, 2000) and SMD=0.00; 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.58; p=0.99 (Akkerman & Ostwald, 2004;Gendron et al, 1996;Gonyea et al, 2016;Gonzalez et al, 2014;Hébert et al, 2003;Passoni et al, 2014), respectively.…”
Section: Individual Versus Group Cbtmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…CBT interventions comprising ≤8 and >8 total number of sessions both demonstrated statistically significant reductions in depression; SMD=-0.34; 95% CI: -0.61 and -0.07; p=0.01 Gendron et al, 1996;Losada-Baltar et al, 2004;Losada et al, 2015Losada et al, , 2005Márquez-González et al, 2007;Quayhagen et al, 2000; and SMD=-0.38; 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.19; p<0.001 (Coon et al, 2003;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2003;Kamkhagi et al, 2015;Losada et al, 2011), respectively. Stress was also significantly reduced relative to comparators in both groups receiving ≤8 and >8 CBT sessions; SMD=-0.43; 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.17; p=0.001 Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2007;Losada-Baltar et al, 2004;Losada et al, 2005;Quayhagen et al, 2000) and SMD=-0.32; 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.11; p=0.003 (Bourgeois et al, 2002;Etxeberria-Arritxabal et al, 2005;Etxeberria Arritxabal et al, 2014;Gallagher-Thompson et al, 2008), respectively. The number of CBT sessions did not significantly influence anxiety levels: ≤8 sessions (SMD=0.22; 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.59; p=0.23) (Gendron et al, 1996;Gonzalez et al, 2014;Losada et al, 2015;Passoni et al, 2014;Quayhagen et al, 2000) and >8 sessions (SMD= -0.09; 95% CI: -0.58 to 0.40; p=0.71) (Akkerman & Ostwald, 2004;Bourgeois et al, 2002;Hébert et al, 2003).…”
Section: Low (≤8) Versus High (>8) Cbt Frequencymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, these results show that caregivers not only benefit from programmes aimed at reducing burnout and emotional distress (Etxeberria et al, 2011) but also benefit from programmes that train them in communication, personal knowledge and cognitive stimulation strategies and the application of those resources in daily care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, estos resultados muestran que los cuidadores no sólo se benefician de programas dirigidos a disminuir el burnout y el malestar emocional (Etxeberria et al, 2011). También se benefician de programas que les formen en la comunicación, conocimiento personal y estrategias de estimulación cognitiva para aplicar en el cuidado diario.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified