2017
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-88702017000100047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efectos de los ingresos del hogar, educación de la mujer y participación laboral femenina sobre la fecundidad ecuatoriana

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pop., v.39, 1-29, e0201, 2022 An alternative hypothesis could be that the decline in fertility is explained by a differential access to the labor market across cohorts, either in terms of the number of women employed, or the types of occupations in which they are concentrated. This last point has been highlighted by several theoretical approaches that hold that motherhood continues to have a major impact on women's paid work and that having more children implies more career penalties for women (BESAMUSCA, 2019;COOLS;MARKUSSEN;STROM, 2017;JACOBS;GERSON, 2004;LANCHIMBA;DIAZ-SANCHEZ, 2017). Thus, I can hypothesize that the identified cohort effect may be explained by different levels of access to the labor market across cohorts.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Stepsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Pop., v.39, 1-29, e0201, 2022 An alternative hypothesis could be that the decline in fertility is explained by a differential access to the labor market across cohorts, either in terms of the number of women employed, or the types of occupations in which they are concentrated. This last point has been highlighted by several theoretical approaches that hold that motherhood continues to have a major impact on women's paid work and that having more children implies more career penalties for women (BESAMUSCA, 2019;COOLS;MARKUSSEN;STROM, 2017;JACOBS;GERSON, 2004;LANCHIMBA;DIAZ-SANCHEZ, 2017). Thus, I can hypothesize that the identified cohort effect may be explained by different levels of access to the labor market across cohorts.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Stepsmentioning
confidence: 95%