2010
DOI: 10.5514/rmac.v34.i1.16226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efectos de Historia en la Adquisición de la Respuesta con Reforzamiento Demorado: Un Análisis Paramétrico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, that difficulty indexes presented in the first study (and in other previously published ones, Pulido, Almaraz, et al, 2010;Pulido, Hernández, et al, 2010) are an indication that superficial similarities are simply insufficient to solve. A qualitative study of the discourse produced by individuals attempting to solve this type of problems (and other LSP), also supported this assumption (Pulido, 2002). Some readers may find these arguments compelling (others may not).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, that difficulty indexes presented in the first study (and in other previously published ones, Pulido, Almaraz, et al, 2010;Pulido, Hernández, et al, 2010) are an indication that superficial similarities are simply insufficient to solve. A qualitative study of the discourse produced by individuals attempting to solve this type of problems (and other LSP), also supported this assumption (Pulido, 2002). Some readers may find these arguments compelling (others may not).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…LSP are appealing to scientists because generating different problem types is easy (combinations and permutations of all alphabet letters, gives a virtually infinite result). Additionally, the superficial vs. structural similarities phenomenon has been replicated in an important number of studies (Burns, 1996;Pulido, 2002;Pulido, de la Garma Valenzuela, et al, 2010). For instance, using a between-groups design, Pulido et al, (2005) observed that undergraduate students correctly solved letter-strings when both practice and target problems were in the same alphabetical order (for instance ABC:ABD/MNO?).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%