2012
DOI: 10.35196/rfm.2012.especial_5.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFECTO DE LA DENSIDAD CELULAR DE INOCULACIÓN EN EL CRECIMIENTO DE Chlorella vulgaris CLV2 CULTIVADA BAJO CONDICIONES MIXOTRÓFICAS

Abstract: El uso de microalgas para el aprovechamiento de biomoléculas (proteínas, carbohidratos y lípidos) ha tomado auge en los últimos años. Entre ellas se encuentra Chlorella vulgaris, microalga unicelular verde motil de forma esférica del Filo Chlorophyta. En este trabajo se evaluaron tres densidades de inoculación de Chlorella vulgaris CLV2 y su efecto en el crecimiento bajo condiciones mixotróficas;los datos se ajustaron a modelos sigmoidales en cada densidad. En el Tratamiento 1 (1 x 106 células mL-1) el mejor m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the use of chlorophyll 'a' analysis (Travieso et al, 2006), the disadvantage is the absence of an immediate resolution, preventing the real-time monitoring and adjustment of the culture conditions. The same problem applies to the traditional algal counts (Lund et al, 1958;Willén, 1976), whose approach also involves a large investment of time, effort, and training (Embleton et al, 2003) and provokes sizeable errors when numerous cells of the same species are present within each single microscopic field (Rodas Gaitán et al, 2012). With respect to the latter method, however, when dilute samples are used from natural ecosystems (multiple species and algal densities <16 individuals/field), the ability to combine taxonomic determination and algal counts represents a distinct advantage in comparison with automatic counters (Embleton et al,2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the use of chlorophyll 'a' analysis (Travieso et al, 2006), the disadvantage is the absence of an immediate resolution, preventing the real-time monitoring and adjustment of the culture conditions. The same problem applies to the traditional algal counts (Lund et al, 1958;Willén, 1976), whose approach also involves a large investment of time, effort, and training (Embleton et al, 2003) and provokes sizeable errors when numerous cells of the same species are present within each single microscopic field (Rodas Gaitán et al, 2012). With respect to the latter method, however, when dilute samples are used from natural ecosystems (multiple species and algal densities <16 individuals/field), the ability to combine taxonomic determination and algal counts represents a distinct advantage in comparison with automatic counters (Embleton et al,2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a variety of methods has been proposed for monitoring the status of algal cultures: namely, automated counts with electronic meters (Javanmardian & Paisson, 1992), chlorophyll analyses (Travieso et al, 2006), spectrophotometric determinations at 650 nm (Wang et al, 2007), turbidity measurements by a photosensitive transistor included in a turbidostat (Skipnes et al, 1980), and enumeration by microscope in Neubauer chambers (Aguirre Ramírez et al, 2007;Ortiz Moreno et al, 2012;Rodas Gaitán et al, 2012). Nevertheless, with these methods, there remains a critical lack of a fast and reliable method for determining algal density that would allow an adjustment of the parameters in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, for the application of C. vulgaris under this photobioreactor proposal, it has been observed that the initial concentration in the inoculum of the kinetics is important to be able to observe an adequate growth over time. That is why in previous works three inoculum conditions were evaluated in initial kinetics taking a concentration of 1x10 6 cells/mL, 2x10 6 cells/mL and 5x10 6 cells/mL where it was observed that in the highest initial concentration there was a time of doubling of 7.5 h differs from those obtained in the lower concentrations that were 59 h and 23.5 h respectively, so this condition is recommended to shorten generation times, have a higher yield of primary and secondary metabolites as well as biomass and with the decrease in growth time, the availability of substrates for other microorganisms that may be contaminating is decreased (Rodas-Gaitán et al, 2012).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Por otro lado, también se demostró que la densidad celular puede influenciar significativamente a la densidad de la población. Es decir que la concentración microbiana del cultivo puede ser un factor que influye en la composición final tras el crecimiento y desarrollo microbiano (39). Se observó que una sola célula cultivada en un ambiente sin la presencia de otras muestras que compitan por sustratos también puede revelar crecimiento celular demostrando que ella misma puede sobrevivir y adaptarse al medio (37).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En ese estudio, las células fueron cultivadas individualmente en cámaras de microfluidos (de un volumen mucho menor) y exhibían una mejor capacidad en responder a la densidad celular comparadas a pruebas de laboratorio con sistemas de cultivo a mayor escala como biorreactores industriales. Esta información nos indica que son diversos factores los que determinan el crecimiento microbiano en cualquier medio, evidenciado la diversidad presente en toda microbiota y que la variabilidad cualitativa de cualquier población puede cambiar en el tiempo debido a la densidad celular, composición de la microbiota, especialización metabólica y la producción de metabolitos (37,38,39). Los resultados obtenidos en nuestro estudio indican que la diversidad microbiana del tocosh puede ser definida por sustratos presentes en cada medio de cultivo, como la respuesta de los microorganismos de la muestra en cada uno, además de factores exógenos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified