2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79423-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG microstate features according to performance on a mental arithmetic task

Abstract: In this study, we hypothesized that task performance could be evaluated applying EEG microstate to mental arithmetic task. This pilot study also aimed at evaluating the efficacy of microstates as novel features to discriminate task performance. Thirty-six subjects were divided into good and poor performers, depending on how well they performed the task. Microstate features were derived from EEG recordings during resting and task states. In the good performers, there was a decrease in type C and an increase in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(133 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For serial subtraction tasks, the coverage, duration, and occurrence of MS3 significantly decreased and these features of MS4 significantly increased after task manipulation. Similar results were also observed by Kim et al (Kim et al, 2021) that a significant decrease of MS3 and a significant increase of MS4 were found in good performance groups while performing mental arithmetic tasks. These findings generally suggest that the influences of cognitive task manipulation (refers to emotion induction in this work) on microstate activities are in line with task effects on the default mode network (task-negative, associated with MS3) and dorsal attention network (task-positive, associated with MS4).…”
Section: The Influence Of Emotion States On Eeg Microstate Activitiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For serial subtraction tasks, the coverage, duration, and occurrence of MS3 significantly decreased and these features of MS4 significantly increased after task manipulation. Similar results were also observed by Kim et al (Kim et al, 2021) that a significant decrease of MS3 and a significant increase of MS4 were found in good performance groups while performing mental arithmetic tasks. These findings generally suggest that the influences of cognitive task manipulation (refers to emotion induction in this work) on microstate activities are in line with task effects on the default mode network (task-negative, associated with MS3) and dorsal attention network (task-positive, associated with MS4).…”
Section: The Influence Of Emotion States On Eeg Microstate Activitiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The findings seem to converge on abnormalities in a specific microstate (type C). This microstate is more prominent during rest than task performance (Kim et al., 2021; Seitzman et al., 2017), and its greater presence in the prestimulus period is associated with subjective reports of mind‐wandering and larger reaction time variations (Zanesco, Denkova, et al., 2020). The suggested neural architecture for the microstate includes key nodes for the default mode network, such as posterior cingulate and precuneus (Custo et al., 2017; Panda et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was conducted on nine healthy and young participants with no sleep problems. Kim et al [ 164 ] proposed a new EEG-based method for performance evaluation. Thirty-six subjects were tested as either excellent or bad performers.…”
Section: Bci Recent Advancementsmentioning
confidence: 99%