2014
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2014.30.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational differentials in cohort fertility during the fertility transition in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recognise that over time the educational distribution of the UK population has changed, with more women having higher qualifications. However, in this paper we are not primarily concerned with quantifying the impact of the changing educational distribution of British females, as has recently been attempted for other countries (Brzozowska 2014;Van Bavel 2014;Yoo 2014), although we do reflect on the changing selection of women into different educational levels. Furthermore, although an understanding of the institutional and socio-economic reasons for the large educational differences in fertility behaviour remains important, this paper does not attempt to distinguish the substantive reasons behind educational differences in the timing or quantum of fertility.…”
Section: Aim and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognise that over time the educational distribution of the UK population has changed, with more women having higher qualifications. However, in this paper we are not primarily concerned with quantifying the impact of the changing educational distribution of British females, as has recently been attempted for other countries (Brzozowska 2014;Van Bavel 2014;Yoo 2014), although we do reflect on the changing selection of women into different educational levels. Furthermore, although an understanding of the institutional and socio-economic reasons for the large educational differences in fertility behaviour remains important, this paper does not attempt to distinguish the substantive reasons behind educational differences in the timing or quantum of fertility.…”
Section: Aim and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oldest cohort of women (1916)(1917)(1918)(1919)(1920)) is chosen as the benchmark for the cohorts born between 1916 and 1960, which have experienced the first demographic transition. By contrast, the younger cohorts born since 1960 can be seen as an early generation of the second demographic transition because of their experience of belowreplacement fertility and their relatively high educational attainment (Yoo 2014). For these cohorts I define the 1956-1960 cohort as the benchmark representing the marriage pattern characteristic of the final stage of the first demographic transition.…”
Section: Analytical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, education-specific fertility estimates from extant studies are not easily comparable due to differences in data sources, methodology, and the criteria used to classify educational groups. A recent study by Yoo (2014) estimates completed cohort fertility by utilizing the question in the census that asks the number of children ever born. Yoo (2014) uses past censuses to estimate completed cohort fertility for women born between 1926 and 1970.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%