2001
DOI: 10.1080/03054980124690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational Contestability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now commonly taken for granted (e.g. by Partington, 2001) that there is no such thing as 'the concept' of education, but only a number of competing concepts or ideas or conceptions associated with the term 'education'. When philosophers talk of 'the concept' of X, they refer (roughly) to the range of public meaning that 'X' has in some natural language, or its equivalent in other natural languages: 'the concept marked by "dog" ("Hund", "chien", etc.)'.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now commonly taken for granted (e.g. by Partington, 2001) that there is no such thing as 'the concept' of education, but only a number of competing concepts or ideas or conceptions associated with the term 'education'. When philosophers talk of 'the concept' of X, they refer (roughly) to the range of public meaning that 'X' has in some natural language, or its equivalent in other natural languages: 'the concept marked by "dog" ("Hund", "chien", etc.)'.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tampoco es una excusa el hecho de que, como se da ahora por sentado -véase la sección D de este escrito y a Partington (2001)-"el concepto de educación" pueda ser "discutible", lo que incluso privaría a la filosofía de la educación de cualquier tema fijo o identificable. Incluso si esa opinión fuera cierta (o inteligible), esto también podría aplicar a los conceptos de ciencia, de derecho o de moralidad y, sin embargo, en esos casos, esta opinión es completamente inofensiva.…”
unclassified