2007
DOI: 10.1007/s12122-007-9024-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational Attainment and the Lesbian Wage Premium

Abstract: Wages, Lesbians, Heterosexuals, Education,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The losses of heterosexual women associated with their situation within occupations are even greater (above 8% of the average wage of the benchmark economy), which means this group has a total earning loss of nearly 16%. These findings are consistent with the earning advantage of lesbian workers compared with straight women that has been shown in previous studies (Antecol et al 2008;Daneshvary et al 2008).…”
Section: Quantifying the Economic Consequences Of Segregationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The losses of heterosexual women associated with their situation within occupations are even greater (above 8% of the average wage of the benchmark economy), which means this group has a total earning loss of nearly 16%. These findings are consistent with the earning advantage of lesbian workers compared with straight women that has been shown in previous studies (Antecol et al 2008;Daneshvary et al 2008).…”
Section: Quantifying the Economic Consequences Of Segregationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Table 6 also shows that all these findings remain when using well-being measures. Consequently, lesbian women fare better than straight women while gay men fare worse than their straight counterparts, which is in line with previous studies on sexual orientation wage gap (Allegretto and Arthur 2001;Black et al 2003;Blandford 2003;Daneshvary et al 2008;Klawitter 2015). 11 However our study allows us to quantify In any case, the lesbian wage advantage seems to strongly depend, though, on the indicator used for sexual orientation and also on how labor intensity and experience are accounted for, whether the analyses take into account that lesbian women previously married to men may have different experiences than other lesbian women (Daneshvary et al 2009), or even the household division of labor within same-sex female couples, with a "primary" earner and a "secondary" one (Schneebaum 2013).…”
Section: Propensity Score Proceduressupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Prior studies using national data report higher educational attainment among LGB individuals (Berg and Lien 2002; Black et al 2000; Black et al 2003; Black et al 2007; Carpenter 2005; Daneshvary et al 2008; Elmslie and Tebaldi 2007). Although bivariate results suggest that this might be the case in our sample for men who report same-sex attraction only in adulthood, these findings did not hold in multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the 1990 Census, Black and colleagues (2000) found that among 25 to 34 year olds, approximately 43% of gay partnered men had at least a college degree compared to 24% of married heterosexual men, whereas 47% of lesbian partnered women had at least a college degree compared to 22% of married heterosexual women. Other studies on wage discrimination based on sexual orientation have also reported higher levels of educational attainment among sexual minority persons in bivariate analyses using a variety of population-based data sources (e.g., the General Social Survey, the Current Population Survey, and the California Health Interview Survey) (Berg and Lien 2002; Black et al 2003; Black, Sanders, and Taylor 2007; Carpenter 2005; Daneshvary, Waddoups, and Wimmer 2008; Elmslie and Tebaldi 2007). All of these studies, however, had limited external validity, as the samples were restricted to cohabitating partners, full-time workers, or both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3 Importantly, although there are evidences that lesbians earn more than heterosexual women in the US (Badgett, 2001;Berg and Lien, 2002;Jepsen, 2007;Daneshvary et al, 2008), in UK (Arabsheibani et al, 2005), and in the Netherlands (Plug and Berkhout, 2004) all correspondence tests suggest that lesbians face statistically significant hiring discrimination in Toronto (Adam, 1981), Austria (Weichselbaumer, 2003), Greece (Drydakis, 2011), and Sweden (Ahmed et al, 2012). Since, discriminatory treatments are assigned we can suggest that statistical discrimination against lesbians might be present at the initial stage of the hiring process.…”
Section: Different Forms Of Field Experiments Have Been Used To Test mentioning
confidence: 98%