2018
DOI: 10.1111/phn.12514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education level as a predictor of condom use in jail‐incarcerated women, with fundamental cause analysis

Abstract: Objective: To model condom usage by jail-incarcerated women incarcerated in U.S. local jails and understand results in terms of fundamental cause theory. Design, Sample, Measurements: We surveyed 102 women in an urban jail in the Midwest U.S. Chi-square tests and generalized linear modeling were used to identify factors of significance for women who used condoms during last-sex compared with women who did not. Stepwise multiple logistic regression was conducted to estimate the relation between the outcome va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 14 articles, five ( n = 5) were editorials (Peate, 2018, 2019, 2021a, 2021b, 2022), one ( n = 1) commentary (Shelton et al, 2020), one discursive paper (Jack & Irving, 2020) and one ( n = 1) literature review (Jack, 2021). Of the six primary research papers, four ( n = 4) articles used quantitative methods (Duran et al, 2018; Emerson et al, 2018; Kearney & Byrne, 2018; Kızılkaya et al, 2022) and two ( n = 2) used qualitative methods (Cukale‐Matos & Champion, 2022; Geana et al, 2021).…”
Section: Findings/resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 14 articles, five ( n = 5) were editorials (Peate, 2018, 2019, 2021a, 2021b, 2022), one ( n = 1) commentary (Shelton et al, 2020), one discursive paper (Jack & Irving, 2020) and one ( n = 1) literature review (Jack, 2021). Of the six primary research papers, four ( n = 4) articles used quantitative methods (Duran et al, 2018; Emerson et al, 2018; Kearney & Byrne, 2018; Kızılkaya et al, 2022) and two ( n = 2) used qualitative methods (Cukale‐Matos & Champion, 2022; Geana et al, 2021).…”
Section: Findings/resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the qualitative methodologies used, one ( n = 1) study used semi‐structured interviews and thematic analysis (Cukale‐Matos & Champion, 2022) and one ( n = 1) study used telephone interviews and open‐coded analysis (Geana et al, 2021). Of the quantitative methodologies used, one ( n = 1) study used quasi‐experimental methods without a control group and conducted pre and post‐test evaluations (Kızılkaya et al, 2022), one ( n = 1) study used an exploratory, descriptive design (Kearney & Byrne, 2018) and two ( n = 2) studies used cross‐sectional methods (Duran et al, 2018; Emerson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Findings/resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high prevalence of the incarceration predictors that we identified in this sample points to potentially synergistic socioeconomic forces that disproportionately impact Black and Latino MSM and is consistent with fundamental cause theory [ 29 , 30 ]. Specifically, one’s socioeconomic standing, as defined as wealth, social connections, knowledge and power, influences access to resources and to technical developments that determine the degree to which individuals can mitigate or navigate emerging risk factors over time [ 31 , 34 ]. Without such access, disparities in both disease and incarceration rates persist, even as individuals receive interventions (e.g., public health insurance or HIV transitional case management) to mitigate some of these risks [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intersections of incarceration risk may be best understood by applying Fundamental Cause Theory. This theory holds that health disparities are determined by the degree to which someone has access to basic and innovative resources for health, well-being, and thriving [29][30][31]. Denied access to these resources results from systemic de-investment in communities in areas like education, information technology infrastructure, and business and organizational development for employment opportunity (e.g., redlining), and from punitive immigration and zero tolerance policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incarcerated women are in this group, having the STI problem enhanced during their deprivation of liberty (3) . These women are more likely to be infected with an STI when compared to the general population (4)(5)(6) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%