2006
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.041319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice

Abstract: Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably as indicators of a hypothetical latent social dimension. Although correlated, they measure different phenomena and tap into different causal mechanisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
411
0
20

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 531 publications
(455 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
24
411
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…One such result is that the health differences that emerge do not only exist between those with very high social status compared to those with very low status; the relationship is linear and positive, so that those with slightly higher social status have better health than those with slightly lower status (Adler et al, 1994;Lynch et al, 2000;Marmot, 2004;Wilkinson & Pickett, 2006). Another consistent finding is that social status has to do with access to resources in any form (Adler et al, 1994, Geyer et al, 2006 and the ability to feel a sense of control. It could be exercising control over material and economic factors (Lynch et al, 2000), over life situations (Marmot, 2004), or over a work situation (Geyer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Social Status and Its Consequencessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One such result is that the health differences that emerge do not only exist between those with very high social status compared to those with very low status; the relationship is linear and positive, so that those with slightly higher social status have better health than those with slightly lower status (Adler et al, 1994;Lynch et al, 2000;Marmot, 2004;Wilkinson & Pickett, 2006). Another consistent finding is that social status has to do with access to resources in any form (Adler et al, 1994, Geyer et al, 2006 and the ability to feel a sense of control. It could be exercising control over material and economic factors (Lynch et al, 2000), over life situations (Marmot, 2004), or over a work situation (Geyer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Social Status and Its Consequencessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Another consistent finding is that social status has to do with access to resources in any form (Adler et al, 1994, Geyer et al, 2006 and the ability to feel a sense of control. It could be exercising control over material and economic factors (Lynch et al, 2000), over life situations (Marmot, 2004), or over a work situation (Geyer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Social Status and Its Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The subject might be more receptive to information in health matters, since this type of messages are often written in educated language making it possible for such individuals to more easily adapt to healthy behaviours. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that better education is also associated with both higher compliance [30] and commitment to medical treatment [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low-status job with a given exposure profile would be relatively better paid in a redistributive society than in other countries. As income has been found to have an independent effect on selfrated health (Geyer et al, 2006) (50), higher minimum wages may increase resilience to occupational exposures, particularly in lower status occupations¾ for example, by enabling low-end employees to secure better material living conditions (such as a car or a decent dwelling) and better opportunities to buy services (vacations, health services, practical help, etc.) and by improving the effort-reward balance through a comparably higher reward.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%