Work, Health, and Welfare: The Association between Working Conditions, Welfare States, and Self-Reported General Health in Europe

Abstract

This article is the first to examine the association between self-reported general health and a wide range of working conditions at the European level and by type of welfare state regime. Data for 21,705 men and women ages 16 to 60 from 27 European countries were obtained from the 2010 European Working Conditions Survey. The influence of individual-level sociodemographic, physical, and psychosocial working conditions and of the organization of work were assessed in multilevel logistic regression analyses, with additional stratification by welfare state regime type (Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Eastern European, Scandinavian, and Southern). At the European level, we found that "not good" general health was more likely to be reported by workers more exposed to hazardous working conditions. Most notably, tiring working positions, job strain, and temporary job contracts were strongly associated with a higher likelihood of reporting "not good" health. Analysis by welfare state regime found that only tiring or painful working conditions were consistently associated with worse self-reported health in all regimes. There was no evidence that the Scandinavian welfare regime protected against the adverse health effects of poor working conditions. The article concludes by examining the implications for comparative occupational health research.It is well established that work is an important social determinant of health and health inequalities (1, 2). Hazardous physical working conditions (e.g., ergonomic problems), stressful psychosocial work environments (e.g., high job demands and

Worker’s well-being. Evidence from the apparel industry in Mexico

“…These indirect effects corroborate the important role of perceptions of developmental support from co-workers and supervisory mentors for the promotion of work engagement (Spell, Eby, and Vandenberg 2014). In contrast to previous findings (Parsons 2000;Bakker and Demerouti 2007;Fuß et al 2008;Avey, Luthans, and Jensen 2009;Kjellstrom, Holmer, and Lemke 2009;Demerouti and Bakker 2011;Akbari et al 2013;Xiang et al 2014;Bambra et al 2014;Rourke 2014;Albrecht et al 2015;de Neve, Krekel, and Ward 2018), we did not observe direct impacts from physical working conditions, social support provided by supervisors and colleagues, or work-family conflict on either well-being or work outcomes.…”

“…high work load, conflicting demands, an unsupportive or hostile working environment, work pressure) and to low levels of control (lack of decision-making authority, inflexible time schedules, lack of skill development and skill use) are more likely to report (1) unfavorable performance outcomes (e.g. lower job satisfaction and increased turnover) (Avey, Luthans, and Jensen 2009;Bambra et al 2014;Rourke 2014;Albrecht et al 2015), and (2) reduced well-being (Bakker and Demerouti 2007;Demerouti and Bakker 2011). On the other hand, when conceptualized from the positive perspective, support from supervisors and coworkers (Spell, Eby, and Vandenberg 2014), organizational support (Eisenberger and Huntington 1986;Rhoades and Eisenberger 2002;Eisenberger 2003) and organizational climate and culture (Zohar and Hofmann 2012) were empirically confirmed to protect against negative effects of job burden.…”

“…We incorporated resources in life into our conceptual model following earlier findings showing that insufficient and unequal access to clean water, sanitation and health care (CSDH 2008;Marmot et al 2008), inadequate nutrition (Pernia and Quibria 1999) and lack of work-family balance (Fuß et al 2008;Bambra et al 2014;de Neve, Krekel, and Ward 2018) lead to deterioration in health and wellbeing. Multinational corporations are strongly encouraged to provide sufficient resources in life for their employees, especially those in the supply chains, in order to meet their corporate social responsibility and sustainable development goals for health and well-being (Kolk 2016).…”

Positive cross-cultural psychology: Exploring similarity and difference in constructions and experiences of wellbeing

“…For instance, analysing the 2010 European Working Conditions Survey, Bambra, Lunau, Van der Wel, Eikemo, and Dragano (2014) found that while unemployment reliably lowered health and wellbeing, its impact was strongly mediated by the nature of the welfare regime in each country. Returning to the individualistcollectivist distinction, research has suggested that unemployment may be less easy to bear in (Martella & Maass, 2000).…”

Risk and resilience: health inequalities, working conditions and sickness benefit arrangements: an analysis of the 2010 European Working Conditions survey

“…In particular, the welfare state, which distributes collective resources and provides social protection, may cushion the influence of work hazards on health (Bambra et al . , Dragano et al . ).…”