2015
DOI: 10.17159/i60a03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education for sustainable agriculture: the old and new curricula for agricultural sciences in South African schools

Abstract: This article explores the support given to Education for Sustainable Agriculture (ESA) bythe South African Agricultural Sciences school curricula. It compares two post-apartheidcurricula: the current Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS) and the phased-outNational Curriculum Statement (NCS) for Agricultural Sciences in terms of content,knowledge requirements, cognitive processes and philosophies of education for sustainableagriculture, as well as the role of assessment and the stated purpose of the cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of the institutional organization of the structure of education to meet the needs of the agronomic business, the identification of vectors and mechanisms for the transformation of relevant institutions, the progress and consequences of institutional reforms, the internal structure and the influence of external institutions on the reform of agricultural enterprises and education are currently attracting special attention of researchers [10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the institutional organization of the structure of education to meet the needs of the agronomic business, the identification of vectors and mechanisms for the transformation of relevant institutions, the progress and consequences of institutional reforms, the internal structure and the influence of external institutions on the reform of agricultural enterprises and education are currently attracting special attention of researchers [10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%