1982
DOI: 10.2307/3317373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education as Environmental Socialization: Classroom Spatial Patterns and the Transmission of Sociocultural Norms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, early research by Johnson (1982), where the physical infrastructure of the classroom was examined, determined that the manner in which desks were situated not only illustrated the teacher-to-student and student-to-student relationships within the classroom but also shed light on how students were expected to learn within the classroom context. Pioneering work by Gilmore (1985) provided a compelling qualitative account of how classroom behavioral preferences held by teachers did not allow African American students an opportunity to express their competence as academic learners, despite the students' demonstrated ability to perform academic tasks in manners linked to preferred Afrocultural orientations and themes.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, early research by Johnson (1982), where the physical infrastructure of the classroom was examined, determined that the manner in which desks were situated not only illustrated the teacher-to-student and student-to-student relationships within the classroom but also shed light on how students were expected to learn within the classroom context. Pioneering work by Gilmore (1985) provided a compelling qualitative account of how classroom behavioral preferences held by teachers did not allow African American students an opportunity to express their competence as academic learners, despite the students' demonstrated ability to perform academic tasks in manners linked to preferred Afrocultural orientations and themes.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, cultural discontinuity, as applied to home-toschool transitions, has been used to explain the additional work that students from culturally-and linguistically-diverse families have to do in meeting expectations for school success that are based on dominant norms. While students are expected to learn classroom practices and norms at school (Mehan, 1998) as a way of 'socialization' (Boykin, Tyler, & Miller, 2005;Gay, 2010;Johnson, 1982), students coming from diverse home cultures incongruent to that of the US white middle class face a dramatic transition as they work to adhere to the standardized school culture (Ogbu, 1982).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em resumo, o professor de línguas estrangeiras é aquele que inspira os estudantes, assume a autoridade quando necessário A organização do espaço de aprendizagem, desde a disposição física da sala de aula -incluindo o tipo e arranjo das carteiras, os recursos didáticos usados e mesmo o lugar preferido para estudar -, também tem sido investigada pelo impacto que pode produzir na aprendizagem de línguas, facilitando ou dificultando a interação entre estudantes, e entre estudantes e professor (ARENDS, 2008;WEINSTEIN, 1979). Com relação ao tipo de móveis, o pressuposto é o de que o uso de mesas redondas, organizando os estudantes em pequenos grupos, propicie a colaboração, a interação e o trabalho em equipe (JOHNSON, 1982), mas os resultados não têm sido conclusivos (RIDLING, 1994;WENGEL, 1992) e também não se sabe com segurança o que os estudantes realmente preferem (JACKSON, 2009). Há variação não só de um estudante para outro, mas também pelo mesmo estudante, que em determinados momentos pode preferir arranjos diferentes (LOTFY, 2012), dependendo de sua personalidade, da tarefa executada e até do professor.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Com relação ao tipo de móveis, o pressuposto é o de que o uso de mesas redondas, organizando os estudantes em pequenos grupos, propicie a colaboração, a interação e o trabalho em equipe (JOHNSON, 1982), mas os resultados não têm sido conclusivos (RIDLING, 1994;WENGEL, 1992) e também não se sabe com segurança o que os estudantes realmente preferem (JACKSON, 2009). Há variação não só de um estudante para outro, mas também pelo mesmo estudante, que em determinados momentos pode preferir arranjos diferentes (LOTFY, 2012), dependendo de sua personalidade, da tarefa executada e até do professor.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified