2015
DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2014.985017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editors’ Introduction to the Thematic Issue: Mad about Methods? Teaching Research Methods in Political Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A secondary motivation for conducting our study was that we wanted to design a built-in field experiment in a methods course that made the various steps of research design and analysis more tangible to students. Our hope was that working with data that they helped generate would increase student interest in and engagement with material that often is outside of “students’ sphere of interest” (Adriaensen, Kerremans, and Slootmaeckers 2015, 4) and causes unusually high student anxiety (Bernstein and Allen 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A secondary motivation for conducting our study was that we wanted to design a built-in field experiment in a methods course that made the various steps of research design and analysis more tangible to students. Our hope was that working with data that they helped generate would increase student interest in and engagement with material that often is outside of “students’ sphere of interest” (Adriaensen, Kerremans, and Slootmaeckers 2015, 4) and causes unusually high student anxiety (Bernstein and Allen 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our investigation goes beyond simply evaluating the equivalence of test modes by providing an explanation for why performance might be higher in computer-based exams. Finally, by using student-generated data to answer a question of direct interest to students and faculty alike, we provide another tool for engaging students with research methods in political science (Adriaensen, Kerremans, and Slootmaeckers 2015; Rosen 2018). Moreover, our investigation goes beyond simply evaluating the equivalence of test modes by providing an explanation for why performance might be higher in computer-based exams.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research design and operationalization present unique challenges because students must acquire knowledge and skills to successfully conduct independent research (Adriaensen, Kerremans, and Slootmaeckers 2015). Students struggle to acquire these crucial skills when material is dry and there are few engaging experiences.…”
Section: Active Learning and Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subjects on quantitative social research do not tend to be students' favourites ( [6]). Computer, math and statistic anxiety have been discussed widely as one of its underlying reasons ( [7]; [8]; [9]; [10], 2007;DeCesare, 2006). Also, research argues that students ignored that an important part of Sociology is based on numbers ( [1]; [4]; [5]); the same authors argue that the technical terminology of methods is not easy to apprehend ( [1]; [4]; [5]).…”
Section: On Teaching Quantitative Techniques In Social Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on teaching quantitative techniques in social science makes various proposals in order to minimize the difficulties listed a above, for example: teaching techniques practically and not isolated, working with a wide range of examples appealing to a heterogeneous public and its context, introducing group work and formats which facilitate to talk about methods, and re-signifying the paper of the teacher in a sense of mentoring a practical and guided learning experience ( [1]; [4]; [5]; [8]; [9]).…”
Section: On Teaching Quantitative Techniques In Social Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%