Editors' Introduction

Bender, Daniel E.; Corpis, Duane J.; Walkowitz, Daniel J.

doi:10.1215/01636545-2799872

Cited by 21 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…63 Through their tactical deployment of words and mobilisation of noise, disruptors 'expressed dissent, created solidarities, and manifested opposition and resistance'. 64 Through what David Kennerley terms 'sonic disobedience', 65 an audience could test and, to varying degrees, steer 'the performance on the platform', 66 as could those outside a venue, given 'sound's pene-trative quality'. 67 Disruption signalled the rejection of a political appeal, helping control the reception thereof, and could vocalise and disseminate alternative points, making it a form of political communication.…”

Section: The Practice and Defence Of Disruptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England^*

Lloyd‐Jones

2024

Parliamentary History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the oral and physical disruption of ‘public’ meetings in England in the spring of 1886, when such activity formed part of broader contests over the legitimacy of extra‐parliamentary responses to the Liberal government's Irish Home Rule Bill. Disruption is an important example of the diverse ways in which home rule energised politics outside Westminster and of the heatedness of grassroots responses to it. For those who engaged in it, disruption offered forms of political interaction and participation that, additionally, made claims to representation and opinion. However, disruption was a practice of contestation that was itself the subject of contention and it was decried as transgressing the bounds of appropriate political conduct. Disruption could be seen, in both intent and effect, as a permissive or subversive, inclusive or exclusionary, behaviour. It could therefore legitimise or undermine claims that popular feeling was on the side of or opposed to the policy. The ‘politics of disruption’ both reflected and generated intense debate about the state of politics in an age of ‘mass democracy’ – of which home rule was the first major crisis – and about the sanctity of political rights and liberties. This article argues that our understanding of political disruption is enhanced by examining its practice and reception at historical moments, outside the episodic election cycle, when contemporaries believed that it was critically important that ‘public opinion’ on a political issue be ascertained and voiced, and when the validity of such opinion was disputed.

show abstract

Section: The Practice and Defence Of Disruptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England^*

Lloyd‐Jones

2024

Parliamentary History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Noise hearers do not appear on camera to film their reactions to noise, nor do they narrate what they are hearing. Instead, residents like Gina produce an artifact, “a materialization of durable indexicality” (Inoue 2018, 223), or the “chimera of objectivity” (Bender, Corpis, and Walkowitz 2015, 3). Like the noise inspectors who are supposed to manage noise only through decibel measurements, noise hearers attempt to “bypass the human” by using audiovisual recordings “to let nature speak” (Lempert 2019, 25).…”

Section: When No One Else Will Listenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Making noise in urban Taiwan

Hsieh

2021

American Ethnologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During Taiwan's transition from authoritarian rule to liberal governance in the 1970s–80s, the government introduced a noise‐control system that uses technological instruments to manage citizens’ everyday noise problems. Rather than reducing noise problems, however, the system has amplified the disparity between a sound that is heard and one that is measured, calling into question the efficacy of noise control to attend to citizens’ needs. For residents and state actors in Taipei, the contradiction underlying noise control forms a lived condition of urban life, one that has initiated sono‐sociality, or social relations that emerge through efforts to communicate and interact with sound. [sound, noise, acoustemology, environment, governance, urban, Taipei, Taiwan]

show abstract

“…He concocted the “Hanger Limb,” a prosthesis leg made of barrel staves and metal with pivot joints at the knee and ankle, which was the most exceptional prosthesis at that point. Ysidro M. Martinez had a critical effect on the historical backdrop of prostheses during the 1970s when he fabricated a lower-limb prosthesis that concentrated on improving gait and reducing friction rather than replicating the motion of a natural limb (Bender, 2015). Regarding the current requirement of prostheses, one billion individuals worldwide have some disability, with about 200 million having significant functional problems (World Health Organization, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Additive manufacturing for prostheses development: state of the art

Savsani

Singh

Mali

2022

RPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Medical devices are undergoing rapid changes because of the increasing affordability of advanced technologies like additive manufacturing (AM) and three-dimensional scanning. New avenues are available for providing solutions and comfort that were not previously conceivable. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the research on developing prostheses using AM to understand the opportunities and challenges in the domain. Various studies on prosthesis development using AM are investigated to explore the scope of integration of AM in prostheses development. Design/methodology/approach A review of key publications from the past two decades was conducted. Integration of AM and prostheses development is reviewed from the technologies, materials and functionality point of view to identify challenges, opportunities and future scope. Findings AM in prostheses provides superior physical and cognitive ergonomics and reduced cost and delivery time. Patient-specific, lightweight solutions for complex designs improve comfort, functionality and clinical outcomes. Compared to existing procedures and methodologies, using AM technologies in prosthetics could benefit a large population. Originality/value This paper helps investigate the impact of AM and related technology in the field of prosthetics and can also be viewed as a collection of relevant medical research and findings.

show abstract

Editors' Introduction

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England^*

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England^*

Making noise in urban Taiwan

Additive manufacturing for prostheses development: state of the art

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Editors' Introduction

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England*

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England*

Making noise in urban Taiwan

Additive manufacturing for prostheses development: state of the art

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England^*

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England^*