2002
DOI: 10.1002/cbm.483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial introduction three longitudinal studies of children's development in Pittsburgh: the Developmental Trends Study, the Pittsburgh Youth Study, and the Pittsburgh Girls Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At least in terms of contemporaneous academic performance, person-based analyses again showed that the vulnerability effects of delinquency largely derived from the multiproblem group, that is, those high on substance use and delinquency, and also disengaged from school. Again, our findings on urban teens with multiple problems are not surprising in view of prior evidence on these youth (see Jessor, 1998;Loeber, Stouthamer-Loeber, Farrington, Lahey, Keenan, & White, 2002). On the other hand, the results on affluent adolescents are noteworthy in indicating that, regardless of the resources allegedly available to them (Luthar, 2003a;Luthar & Burack, 2000), a nontrivial proportion of suburban teenagers (1 of every 10 in this sample) manifest high disturbance across multiple domains; further, these multiproblem youth clearly reflect significant concurrent risk for poor grades during the high school years.…”
Section: Common Themes Across Contexts: School Disengagement Delinqumentioning
confidence: 60%
“…At least in terms of contemporaneous academic performance, person-based analyses again showed that the vulnerability effects of delinquency largely derived from the multiproblem group, that is, those high on substance use and delinquency, and also disengaged from school. Again, our findings on urban teens with multiple problems are not surprising in view of prior evidence on these youth (see Jessor, 1998;Loeber, Stouthamer-Loeber, Farrington, Lahey, Keenan, & White, 2002). On the other hand, the results on affluent adolescents are noteworthy in indicating that, regardless of the resources allegedly available to them (Luthar, 2003a;Luthar & Burack, 2000), a nontrivial proportion of suburban teenagers (1 of every 10 in this sample) manifest high disturbance across multiple domains; further, these multiproblem youth clearly reflect significant concurrent risk for poor grades during the high school years.…”
Section: Common Themes Across Contexts: School Disengagement Delinqumentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Numerous studies have explored the onset or initiation of delinquent careers (Bacon, Paternoster, & Brame, 2009;Dean, Brame, & Piquero, 1996;DeLisi, 2006;Eggleston & Laub, 2002;Gomez-Smith & Piquero, 2006;Perez McCluskey, McCluskey, & Bynum, 2006;Tibbetts & Piquero, 1999;White & Piquero, 2004). It is axiomatic that criminal career extremity is inversely related to onset, and the demarcation of a childhood-onset of conduct problems is central to the psychiatric diagnosis of behavioral disorders, theorization in the social and behavioral sciences, and the scholarly study of individual crime patterns (Lahey, Moffitt, & Caspi, 2003;Loeber & Farrington, 2000;Loeber et al, 2002;Stouthamer-Loeber et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Pittsburgh Youth Study 33,35 was a longitudinal study of inner-city boys that also began in 1987, and whose aim was to trace the development of antisocial and delinquent behaviour from childhood to early adulthood. Among boys in the first, fourth, and seventh years in the Pittsburgh public schools, 1517 were screened, and the 30% most antisocial were selected for follow-up, along with 30% of the remainder as a comparator.…”
Section: Youth Follow-up Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Developmental Trends Study 21,33,34 began in 1987 and involved 177 boys in Pennsylvania and Georgia, age 7 to 12 years, who were followed up at regular intervals into early adulthood. The purpose of the study was to document the course of disruptive behaviour over time and its interaction with co-occurring disorders.…”
Section: Youth Follow-up Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%