1998
DOI: 10.1080/13554799808410636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory

Abstract: The anatomical and neurophysiological bases of memory have been significantly advanced by integrative approaches bridging previously existing gaps between individual neuroscientific disciplines. The time-and content-based division of memory has been widely accepted: episodic and semantic memory, procedural memory and priming are frequently used terms. On the anatomical side, a division into forms of memory dependent on the limbic system (episodic and semantic information) and others (procedural memory and prim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These neurophysiological ¢ndings ¢t well with other studies that have also detected posterior activation in episodic remembering (Nyberg et al 2000;Wheeler et al 2000; see also Markowitsch 1998) and collectively they suggest that EMs may be represented in those sensoryperceptual regions of the brain involved in their original processing. AM is, however, more than just a record of sensory-perceptual processing, and the pattern of activation unfolding over the whole period and culminating in an interlocked pattern of frontal and posterior activation once a memory is formed shows, by the present view, conceptual autobiographical knowledge being linked to sensory-perceptual episodic memory, and in so doing provides a retrieval context for EMs.…”
Section: (E) Neurologysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These neurophysiological ¢ndings ¢t well with other studies that have also detected posterior activation in episodic remembering (Nyberg et al 2000;Wheeler et al 2000; see also Markowitsch 1998) and collectively they suggest that EMs may be represented in those sensoryperceptual regions of the brain involved in their original processing. AM is, however, more than just a record of sensory-perceptual processing, and the pattern of activation unfolding over the whole period and culminating in an interlocked pattern of frontal and posterior activation once a memory is formed shows, by the present view, conceptual autobiographical knowledge being linked to sensory-perceptual episodic memory, and in so doing provides a retrieval context for EMs.…”
Section: (E) Neurologysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This then would seem to imply a left hemisphere‐lateralized autobiographical memory system. However, Markowitsch and colleagues (Fink et al, 1996; Markowitsch, 1998; Markowitsch, 1995) have demonstrated greater right hemisphere activation during the retrieval of autobiographical memories. It may be possible to explain the differences in cortical activity associated with retrieval from autobiographical memory in terms of the methodological differences across these studies (for a review see Conway et al, 2002).…”
Section: The Self As An Associative Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La neuropsicología ha perfilado de modo sistemático la relación entre las estructuras de la memoria y sus bases anatómicas. En este proceso, la investigación iniciada por Brenda Milner a raíz de un caso de amnesia global tras una lobulectomía bitemporal [1] se considera un hito histórico, que da comienzo a toda una serie de trabajos que han asociado las funciones de la memoria a los lóbulos temporales mediales y, concretamente, a la formación del hipocampo [2,3]. No obstante, esto no quiere decir que el hipocampo sea la única estructura neuroanatómica responsable del funcionamiento de la memoria, puesto que en este sistema se incluyen otras áreas, como el diencéfalo o el córtex prefrontal.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified