Editorial

Lee, Randolph M.

doi:10.1007/bf00986907

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…유아 지능검사는 영재성, 또는 정신지체 등의 특성을 조기에 발견하여 적절한 교육적 조치를 취함으로써 아동의 잠재력을 고양하거나 문제를 예방하기 위한 노력이 국가적으로 경주되면서 그 필요성이 대두되었다 (Hawthorne, 1983;Ray, & Ulissi, 1982;Schneider, & Gervais, 1991;Thurlow, & Ysseldyke, 1979) (Park, Kwak, & Park, 1996)가 WPPSI-R (Wechsler, 1989)을 바탕 으로 한국형으로 표준화되어 사용되고 있었으나 20년에 가까운 시간이 흘러 재표준화가 필요하 였기 때문이다 (Flynn, 1999) (Brown, Sherbenou, & Johnson, 2009;Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2003) (Lee, 2011)…”

Section: ⅰ 서 론unclassified

A Study of Concurrent Validities of K-WPPSI-IV

Park¹,

Seo²,

Lee³

2015

Korean J Child Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to validate the newly developed K-WPPSI-IV using other current IQ tests in common use in Korea such as the K-ABC and K-CTONI-2. Fifty three 2～7 year olds were tested with both the K-WPPSI-IV and K-ABC in a counterbalanced order. Simultaneous, cognitive, information processing as well as acquisition indices of K-ABC were moderately correlated with the total IQ of K-WPPSI-IV, ranging .44～.58. The results of these tests were comparable with US data:Correlations among WPPSI-IV & DAS-II subscales were .31～.67. The correlations among K-WPPSI-IV & K-CTONI-2 subscales in sixty two children ranged from .43～.49. WMI(Working memory index) as well as PSI(Processing speed index) of K-WPPSI showed low correlations with non-verbal IQ. These results indicated that nonverbal IQ does not test processing speed which in turn is very important in WMI & PSI Indices of K-WPPSI-IV. Further studies are needed to broaden the concurrent validities using K-WISC-IV or K-BSID-2. In addition, predictive as well as discriminate validity studies need to be conducted for better understanding of K-WPPSI-IV.Keywords：한국 웩슬러유아지능검사 4판(K-WPPSI-IV), 한국 카우프만검사(K-ABC), 한국 비언어성 지능검사 2판(K-CTONI-2), 공준타당도(concurrent validity).

show abstract