1980
DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp0101_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Compensation Fails: Mediating Effects of Sex and Locus of Control at Extended Interaction Distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender was not found to be a significant control variable for product count and was therefore not used in the analysis. Gender has been shown in past research to have a significant effect on reactions to personal encounters (Aiello and Thompson 1980; Altman 1975).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender was not found to be a significant control variable for product count and was therefore not used in the analysis. Gender has been shown in past research to have a significant effect on reactions to personal encounters (Aiello and Thompson 1980; Altman 1975).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sundstrom et al [39] as well as Thompson et al [28] suggested a U-shaped relation of IPD and discomfort. They also proposed some degree of sluggishness or tolerance for violations of PS [40]. Short distances from the equilibrium-point should affect discomfort to a lesser degree than large distances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who use larger distances are perceived by others as more rejecting and aggressive (Aiello & Thompson, 1980). One consequence, therefore, of working in isolation may be that employees unwittingly adopt interpersonal distances that lead others to attribute negative traits to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%