Edge Reinforcement of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels

Sam-Brew, Solace; Semple, Kate; Smith, Gregory D.

doi:10.13073/0015-7473-60.4.382

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The behavior of the dowels and L joints (Tas 2010) and lamina in chipboard and MDF boards (Atar et al 2009), as well as its behavior in combination with honeycomb panel constructions (Petutschnigg et al 2004), has been described. The properties of honeycomb panels have been discussed by Sam-Brew et al (2010). These authors studied framed honeycomb panels, which, unlike frameless construction panels, are reinforced by a wooden frame.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical Properties of Knock-down Joints in Honeycomb Panels

Koreny

Šimek

Eckelman³

et al. 2013

BioResources

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on the use of demountable furniture joints in combination with 38-mm-thick honeycomb panels. These fittings were incorporated into L-shaped corner joints and then tested to determine their bending moment capacity. Overall, seven combinations of demountable fittings were tested. These groups of connectors consisted of solution non-glued, partly-glued connectors, and fully-glued connectors. All of the connectors were positioned in the test samples as they are commonly located in furniture construction. The highest capacities were obtained with glued connectors, followed by partly glued and then non-glued connectors. The difference in capacity between the inside and outside positions was insignificant for the non-glued and fullyglued connectors. A large difference between connectors in different positions was found for the partly glued connectors and for the second type of unglued connectors. The modes of failure were analyzed for each connector, and the possibilities for use in construction are described.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical Properties of Knock-down Joints in Honeycomb Panels

Koreny

Šimek

Eckelman³

et al. 2013

BioResources

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous research on the reinforcement of structural timber elements has mainly focused on beams, but application in practice has only occurred in special cases (Bulleit 1984;Corradi et al 2019). Reinforcing materials investigated were steel, aluminium, and fibre reinforced polymers (FRP) (Theakston 1965;Krueger and Sandberg 1974;Bulleit 1980;Bulleit 1981;Spaun 1981;Raftery and Harte 2011;Yang et al 2016;Gattas et al 2018;Palma and Steiger 2020). Bulleit (1984) established three main types of metal reinforcement: pre-stressed steel (Bohannan 1962;Peterson 1965;De Luca and Marano 2012), unstressed metal plates (Mark 1961;Sliker 1962;Borgin et al 1968;Issa and Kmeid 2005;Kim and Harries 2010;Nabati et al 2021), and unstressed steel rods (Lantos 1964;Lantos and Harvey 1964;Lantos 1970;Bulleit et al 1989;De Luca and Marano 2012;Steiger et al 2015;Soriano et al 2016;Yang et al 2016).…”

Section: Reinforcement Of Structural Timber Elementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Steel-Reinforced Columns Made of European Beech Glued-Laminated Timber

Sroka,

Palma,

Steiger

et al. 2024

J. Struct. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the obstacles to the recent trend towards taller timber buildings is the limited loadcarrying capacity of softwood columns. With the aim of promoting the structural use of European beech wood (Fagus sylvatica L.) in high-performance applications, the buckling behaviour of beech glued-laminated timber (GLT) columns reinforced with glued-in steel bars was investigated experimentally and numerically. Axial compression experiments were carried out on full-scale stocky and slender columns and a finite element model was developed and validated against the 1 Sroka,

show abstract