1957
DOI: 10.1038/icb.1957.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ectromelia Virus Multiplication in Regenerating Mouse Liver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1959
1959
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes occur in the nucleus despite the apparent absence of viral material. In addition to the later biochemical changes, virus infection inhibits mitosis in regenerating liver as early as 10 hours after infectionthat is, early in the eclipse phase (Miller and de Burgh, 1957). Ectromelia virus has not been analysed completely, but it is most likely that, as with the closely related vaccinia virus, its nucleic acid is deoxyribonucleic acid (D.N.A.).…”
Section: Site Of Damage In Ectromelia-virus-infected Mousementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes occur in the nucleus despite the apparent absence of viral material. In addition to the later biochemical changes, virus infection inhibits mitosis in regenerating liver as early as 10 hours after infectionthat is, early in the eclipse phase (Miller and de Burgh, 1957). Ectromelia virus has not been analysed completely, but it is most likely that, as with the closely related vaccinia virus, its nucleic acid is deoxyribonucleic acid (D.N.A.).…”
Section: Site Of Damage In Ectromelia-virus-infected Mousementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activities of various enzymes in this system have been estimated and in part reported (de Burgh, 1957;Nelson andde Burgh, 1958, 1959). These have been compared with similar estimations in regenerating mouse liver.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I too was given the task of deciphering how ectromelia virus multiplied in liver cells, but rather than continuing on the line of work that previous BScMed students had performed with normal liver, I thought it more interesting to determine whether the virus might interfere with some crucial biochemical events during liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Two papers resulted from this work (1,2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%