2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem response to 15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
294
7
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
22
294
7
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, N is sequestered from soils by both fungi and bacteria if the C/N ratios of the substrate for decomposition are greater than about 30:1; N is released (N mineralization) by fungi but sequestered by bacteria if the C/N ratios are between 12.5:1 and 30:1; and N is released by both fungi and bacteria if the C/ N ratios are less than about 12.5:1 (Hodge et al 2000). For example, the direct N inputs from N deposition and fertilization to canopy leaves, litterfall, and soil have been reported to increase plant leaf N concentration (Fang et al 2011;Hietz et al 2011;Zak et al 2008) and fine root N content (Magill et al 2004), which has the potential to reduce the C/N ratios of the substrate being decomposed in forest ecosystems, and thus facilitating net microbial N mineralization greatly (Hodge et al 2000;Kaye and Hart 1997).…”
Section: N Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, N is sequestered from soils by both fungi and bacteria if the C/N ratios of the substrate for decomposition are greater than about 30:1; N is released (N mineralization) by fungi but sequestered by bacteria if the C/N ratios are between 12.5:1 and 30:1; and N is released by both fungi and bacteria if the C/ N ratios are less than about 12.5:1 (Hodge et al 2000). For example, the direct N inputs from N deposition and fertilization to canopy leaves, litterfall, and soil have been reported to increase plant leaf N concentration (Fang et al 2011;Hietz et al 2011;Zak et al 2008) and fine root N content (Magill et al 2004), which has the potential to reduce the C/N ratios of the substrate being decomposed in forest ecosystems, and thus facilitating net microbial N mineralization greatly (Hodge et al 2000;Kaye and Hart 1997).…”
Section: N Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our findings, these specific changes (i.e., increased N supply or altered composition, both resulting in higher canopy %N) should increase gross C assimilation [and presumably net C sequestration (4, 25)] and surface albedo, both representing negative feedbacks to warming. Similar effects can be expected from anthropogenic N deposition and widespread use of N fertilizers, which also serve to increase canopy %N (26). Conversely, leaf N concentrations in temperate forests are inversely related to mean annual temperature (27) and are driven down by rising CO 2 (6)(7)(8), suggesting that temperature and CO 2 increases could lead to reduced canopy albedo and a positive feedback to warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A great number of studies on N deposition have been carried out in Europe and North America, where industrial development occur earliest (Matson et al, 1999;Galloway et al, 2003). Results have shown that in predominately N-limited temperate forests in these regions, the experimental and atmospheric N inputs had dramatically altered ecosystem processes and properties, including forest productivity, soil fertility, species composition, litter decomposition, and N loss from soils to groundwater and atmosphere Kahl et al, 1993;Magill et al, 1996Magill et al, , 2000Magill et al, , 2004Emmett et al, 1998;Fenn et al, 1998;Gundersen, 1998;Gundersen et al, 1998Gundersen et al, , 2006Hall and Matson, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%