2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01331.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem input of nitrogen through biological fixation in feather mosses during ecosystem retrogression

Abstract: Summary1. Ecosystem retrogression occurs during the very long-term absence of major disturbances, and it is characterized by decreases in productivity, decomposition rates and nutrient availability. Ratios of total soil nitrogen (N) to phosphorus (P) also characteristically increase during retrogression, but the nature of N inputs to ecosystems undergoing retrogression has seldom been explored. 2. We studied a 5000-year-old chronosequence involving 30 islands that differed greatly in history of disturbance (wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
95
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we estimated biomass of each of the two dominant moss species in each plot (H. splendens and P. schreberi ) using the approach of Lagerstro¨m et al (2007), which involved measuring the depth of the live moss layer of each species at each of 15 random points throughout the plot, and converting mean depth to biomass using previously established calibration equations. Furthermore, within each plot we collected approximately 30 randomly located soil cores beneath the litter layer (each 2.5 cm in diameter 3 10 cm deep; cores consisted entirely of humus) and bulked them into a single sample for abiotic and biotic measurements.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we estimated biomass of each of the two dominant moss species in each plot (H. splendens and P. schreberi ) using the approach of Lagerstro¨m et al (2007), which involved measuring the depth of the live moss layer of each species at each of 15 random points throughout the plot, and converting mean depth to biomass using previously established calibration equations. Furthermore, within each plot we collected approximately 30 randomly located soil cores beneath the litter layer (each 2.5 cm in diameter 3 10 cm deep; cores consisted entirely of humus) and bulked them into a single sample for abiotic and biotic measurements.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All Rights Reserved. [Basilier et al, 1978] TU 1.0-6.4 (4) [Crittenden, 1975] TU 0.0062-0.17 [Forman and Dowden, 1977] TU 0.022-0.18 (3) b [Granhall and Selander, 1973] TU 0.16-9.4 (2) [Gunther, 1989] TU 0.0025-0.01 (3) [Henry and Svoboda, 1986] TU 0.085-0.1 (2) [Kallio, 1975] TU 0.15-0.38 (3) [DeLuca et al, 2002] BO-F 0.17 [Gunther, 1989] BO-F 0.005-0.045 (2) [Huss-Danell, 1977] BO-F 0.1 [Lagerström et al, 2007] BO-F 0.05-0.2 (3) [Zackrisson et al, 2004] BO-F 0.025-0.15 (3) b [Zackrisson et al, 2009] BO-F 0.16 [Antoine, 2004] TE-C 0.15-1.65 (5) [Brown and Dalton, 2002] TE-C 0.2 [Denison, 1973] TE-C 0.59 b [Denison, 1979] TE-C 0.4 [Granhall and Lindberg, 1978] TE-C 0.035 [Green et al, 1980] TE-C 0.5 b [Pike, 1978] TE-C 0.45 [Sucoff, 1979] TE-C 0.006-0.24 (4) [Belnap, 2002] [Zhao et al, 2010] DE 0.4 [Crews et al, 2001] TR-F 0.1-0.2 (3) [Cusack et al, 2009] TR-F 0.38 TR-F 0.02-0.045 (3) [Matzek and Vitousek, 2003] TR-F 0.008-0.06 (6) [Forman, 1975] TR-C 0.48 [Freiberg, 1998] TR-C 0.35 b [Matzek and Vitousek, 2003] TR-C 0.004-0.04 (6) a Biomes are abbreviated as follows: TU = tundra, BO-F = boreal forest floor, TE-C = temperate evergreen canopy, DE = desert, TR-F = tropical rainforest floor, and TR-C = tropical rainforest canopy. Some studies provide more than one observed value (e.g., due to different habitats).…”
Section: Chemical Weatheringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the species removal experiment, we predicted that competition for N would be stronger when resource availability is high, as proposed by some theories (Grime 1973(Grime , 1979 and suggested by previous work within this study system (Wardle and Zackrisson 2005, Wardle et al 2008, Gundale et al 2011b. For the functional group removal experiment, we predicted that removal effects on the three shrubs would be stronger on small islands because previous work from the study system has shown that both feather mosses and tree roots have a larger influence on ecosystem processes in low-fertility than in high-fertility environments (Lagerstro¨m et al 2007, Gundale et al 2010. Collectively, testing these hypotheses will provide insights into how N acquisition by species is influenced by their interactions with other community members, and how these interactions change as a function of resource availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%