Long‐term resilience of above‐ and belowground ecosystem components among contrasting ecosystems

Abstract

Abstract. While several studies have explored how short-term ecological responses to disturbance vary among ecosystems, experimental studies of how contrasting ecosystems recover from disturbance in the longer term are few. We performed a simple long-term experiment on each of 30 contrasting forested islands in northern Sweden that vary in size; as size decreases, time since fire increases, soil fertility and ecosystem productivity declines, and plant species diversity increases. We predicted that resilience of understory plant community properties would be greatest on the larger, more productive islands, and that this would be paralleled by greater resilience of soil biotic and abiotic properties. For each island, we applied three disturbance treatments of increasing intensity to the forest understory once in 1998, i.e., light trimming, heavy trimming, and burning; a fourth treatment was an undisturbed control. We measured recovery of the understory vascular plant community annually over the following 14 years, and at that time also assessed recovery of mosses and several belowground variables. Consistent with our predictions, vascular plant whole-community variables (total cover, species richness, diversity [Shannon's H 0 ], and community composition) recovered significantly more slowly on the smaller (least fertile) than the larger islands, but this difference was not substantial, and only noticeable in the most severely disturbed treatment. When an index of resilience was used, we were unable to detect effects of island size on the recovery of any property. We found that mosses and one shrub species (Empetrum hermaphroditum) recovered particularly slowly, and the higher abundance of this shrub on small islands was sufficient to explain any slower recovery of whole-ecosystem variables on those islands. Further, several belowground variables had not fully recovered from the most intense disturbance after 14 yr, and counter to our predictions, the degree of their recovery was never influenced by island size. While several studies have shown large variation among plant communities in their short-term response (notably resistance) to environmental perturbations, our results reveal that when perturbations are applied equally to highly contrasting ecosystems, differences in resilience among them in the longer term can be relatively minor, regardless of the severity of disturbance.

Linkage of plant trait space to successional age and species richness in boreal forest understorey vegetation

“…; Kumordzi et al . ; Wardle & Jonsson ), we focused on the understorey or ground layer vascular plant vegetation. Understorey layer is responsible for over half of total net primary productivity in the system (Wardle et al .…”

Direct and indirect effects of climate change on soil microbial and soil microbial‐plant interactions: What lies ahead?

“…These events can alter large-scale processes such as regional net primary productivity (Ciais et al 2005, Gu et al 2008 as well as soil physical and biotic properties (Ajwa et al 1999, Certini 2005, Yuste et al 2014. The stability of an ecosystem after disturbance depends on factors such as previous exposure to disturbance as well as community composition and diversity (Banning andMurphy 2008, Wardle andJonsson 2014). Similar to aboveground (Maestre et al 2012), there is growing evidence that belowground diversity is an important component of ecosystem stability and multifunctionality (Lefcheck et al 2015;X.…”

Separating the role of biotic interactions and climate in determining adaptive response of plants to climate change

“…A possible field approach to test current and potentially future adaptation of plants to climate is represented by reciprocal transplants of seed origins from different habitats under contrasting climatic regimes (Sundqvist et al 2013), and comparison of their performance in ''home'' and ''away'' conditions (Galen et al 1991, Linhart and Grant 1996, Wardle and Jonsson 2013. The assumption is that each seed origin has evolved adaptations to best perform in their local climate (Galloway and Fenster 2000).…”