2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem health of Montevideo coastal zone: A multi approach using some different benthic indicators to improve a ten-year-ago assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
26
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed important differences with regard to MUNIZ et al (2004) (i.e. a decrease from average values of 85 to 51 mg g -1 ), which is in close agreement with other studies (GARCÍA-RODRÍGUEZ et al, 2010;MUNIZ et al, 2011). Such studies attribute the decrease in Pb to the use of Pb-free fuel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We observed important differences with regard to MUNIZ et al (2004) (i.e. a decrease from average values of 85 to 51 mg g -1 ), which is in close agreement with other studies (GARCÍA-RODRÍGUEZ et al, 2010;MUNIZ et al, 2011). Such studies attribute the decrease in Pb to the use of Pb-free fuel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The spatial distribution pattern of sediment geochemical variables in the study area closely agrees with previous assessments (Burone et al 2006;Brugnoli et al 2007;García-Rodríguez et al 2011;Muniz et al 2011Muniz et al , 2004aMuniz et al , 2004bVenturini et al 2012Venturini et al , 2004. That is, Montevideo Bay is a polluted system that displays higher values of sediment geochemical variables than those of the coastal zone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Nevertheless, the use of different indices is always advisable in order to obtain a better evaluation of the benthic community's health (MUNIZ et al, 2011;LABRUNE et al, 2006), consequently, it is necessary to include different indices in the assessment schemes to make sure that the natural variability can be detected and considered.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Patterns Of Biotic Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BORJA et al (2004) andMUXIKA et al (2005) state that AMBI was validated in areas involving a large range of impact sources (domestic waste, heavy metals, submarine outfalls, drilling cuts with ester-based mud, industrial and mining waste). Generally, this was done in accordance with the community structure measurements and multivariate methods used in assessing anthropogenic impacts (MUNIZ et al, 2005(MUNIZ et al, , 2011PRATO et al, 2009). A few years later, the same research group proposed a new multivariate index combining AMBI with species richness (S) and community diversity (H'): M-AMBI (MUXIKA et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%