Economics of row spacing and integrated weed management in soybean (Glycine max L.)

Abstract

The high cost of cultivation and weed management are major limiting factors to increasing soybean productivity and net returns. Field experiments were conducted in 2016 and 2017 at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta to evaluate the economic performance of different row spacings and integrated weed management system in soybean. Three row spacings (50, 75 and 100 cm) as the main plots and six weed control methods and a weedy check as sub-plot treatments were accommodated in a split-plot arrangement of a randomized complete block design with three replications. There was a significant reduction in weed biomass with a reduction in row spacing from 100 cm to 75 cm and 50 cm. Furthermore, the cost of production, grain yield and gross profit increased with a reduction in row spacing from 100 to 75 and 50. When soybean was sown at 50-cm row spacing, the application of Probaben 400EC (metolachlor 20% w/v + prometryn 20% w/v) or Butachlor 60EC (butachlor) at 2.0 kg a.i/ha each followed by supplementary hoe-weeding at 6 weeks after sowing (WAS) resulted in the highest yield of 2301-2484 kg/ha and total revenue of 2129-1972 $/ha. Conversely, three hoe-weedings resulted in the highest yield of 2155-2081 kg/ha and total revenue of 1848-1783 $/ha for crops grown at 75-and 100-cm row spacings. Despite the higher yield and revenue obtained with three hoe-weedings for crops grown at 75-and 100-cm row spacings, the gross profit and benefit-cost ratios obtained were lower than those obtained with herbicide treatments applied alone or followed by supplementary hoeweeding. In terms of profitability, soybean planted at 50-cm row spacing and treated with Probaben 400EC at 2.0 kg a.i/ha followed by supplementary hoeweeding gave the highest gross profit of 1479 $/ha. Two or three hoe-weedings in soybean planted at narrow-row (50 cm) spacing did not guarantee the highest yield, but rather increased the cost of weed control. This study suggests that narrow-row spacing (50 cm) and pre-emergence herbicides will help to reduce the number of

Efficacy and economics of integrated weed management in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)

“…The efficiency of propaben or butachlor plus hoe weeding in providing better weed control and increased okra fruit yield than two hoe weedings or either herbicides applied alone may be attributed to the suppression of weeds by the herbicides at the start of crop growth and the removal of weeds by the hoe weeding, both of which helped to control weeds before setting seed. These results have corroborated the report of Daramola et al (2019) that integration of herbicide application and hoe weeding is superior to sole herbicide or manual hoe weeding.…”

Integrated management of problematic weed corn marigold in wheat fields at West and South West Shewa Zones in Ethiopia

“…The gross revenue was calculated by multiplying commercialized price and grain yield (Daramola et al, 2019). The MR was computed as subtracting the total variable costs from the gross revenue (Daramola et al, 2019).…”

“…The gross revenue was calculated by multiplying commercialized price and grain yield (Daramola et al, 2019). The MR was computed as subtracting the total variable costs from the gross revenue (Daramola et al, 2019). In addition, the benefit cost ratio was computed as the proportion of MR (numerator) and total variable cost (denominator) (Daramola et al, 2019).…”

Integrated Management of Corn Marigold (Glebionis segetum) in Tef Field at Western and Southwestern Shewa Zones in Ethiopia

“…The gross revenue was concluded by multiplying of commercialized price and grain yield (Daramola et al, 2019).…”