2018
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic values and selection index in different Angus‐Nellore cross‐bred production systems

Abstract: Bioeconomic models were developed to calculate economic values (EV) for economically important traits in beef cattle, to evaluate the impact of these traits on production profitability, to assess possible market changes with a payment system and to develop economic selection indexes for Angus cattle for two production systems. Two beef cattle production systems were simulated as follows: a cow-calf cycle (CC) and a complete cycle (CoC). Following selection, positive changes in the EV were observed. In the CC, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because this trait is linked to the amount of meat in the carcass, and the simulated systems presented bonus payment for the carcass quality, which directly influenced the profit. A similar result was observed by Fernandes et al (2018) in production systems for crossbred Nellore × Angus, where a greater carcass uniformity benefited the marginal profit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is because this trait is linked to the amount of meat in the carcass, and the simulated systems presented bonus payment for the carcass quality, which directly influenced the profit. A similar result was observed by Fernandes et al (2018) in production systems for crossbred Nellore × Angus, where a greater carcass uniformity benefited the marginal profit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some (co) variance components between the objectives and selection criteria for Aberdeen Angus used in the current study had been estimated previously by Fernandes et al . (2018). The covariance components not found were assumed as zero in the simulation of the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%