Economic Productivity by Age and Sex

Grosse, Scott D.; Krueger, Kurt V.; Mvundura, Mercy

doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31819c9571

Cited by 107 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Disability costs due to hearing loss or neurologic disability following meningitis were estimated from the literature. Future costs related to disability or death were taken from Grosse et al [23], and were based on the expected future lifetime earnings for each age group with 3% discounting Costs are reported in 2007 dollars. Cost inputs and data sources are found in Appendix C.…”

Section: Model Parameters and Assumptions -Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Length of time missed from work and daily market compensation estimates were taken from Grosse et al [23], and were adjusted for the percentage of adults in the work force for each age group. For pediatric patients, work loss was calculated for the caregiver based upon the expected disease-specific duration of symptoms and published estimates of hours of missed work [24].…”

Section: Model Parameters and Assumptions -Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Healthcare utilization and cost of pneumococcal disease in the United States

Huang

Johnson

Ray

et al. 2011

Vaccine

254

189

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Model Parameters and Assumptions -Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Model Parameters and Assumptions -Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Healthcare utilization and cost of pneumococcal disease in the United States

Huang

Johnson

Ray

et al. 2011

Vaccine

254

189

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In addition to NISVS limitations described elsewhere, 1 this study is limited in that its human capital valuation of short-term lost productivity 6 represents a minimum valuation of the immediate negative effects of violence on victims’ productive activities. Moreover, victims’ time lost from work and school in the short-term aftermath of victimization represents a small fraction of the total cost of victimization, but is one of the few economic consequences of intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or stalking that is directly measurable from population-based data.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The value of victims’ lost productivity was calculated as the number of lost days times the estimated daily production value for the U.S. non-institutionalized population (both sexes aged ≥15 years; adjusted to 2016 US$148.43). 6,7 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Short-term Lost Productivity per Victim: Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Violence, or Stalking

Peterson

Liu

Kresnow

et al. 2018

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The purpose of this study is to estimate victims’ lifetime short-term lost productivity because of intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or stalking. Methods U.S. nationally representative data from the 2012 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey were used to estimate a regression-adjusted average per victim (female and male) and total population number of cumulative short-term lost work and school days (or lost productivity) because of victimizations over victims’ lifetimes. Victims’ lost productivity was valued using a U.S. daily production estimate. Analysis was conducted in 2017. Results Non-institutionalized adults with some lifetime exposure to intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or stalking (n=6,718 respondents; survey-weighted n=130,795,789) reported nearly 741 million lost productive days because of victimizations by an average of 2.5 perpetrators per victim. The adjusted per victim average was 4.9 (95% CI=3.9, 5.9) days, controlling for victim, perpetrator, and violence type factors. The estimated societal cost of this short-term lost productivity was $730 per victim, or $110 billion across the lifetimes of all victims (2016 USD). Factors associated with victims having a higher number of lost days included a higher number of perpetrators and being female, as well as sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization by an intimate partner perpetrator, stalking victimization by an acquaintance perpetrator, and sexual violence or stalking victimization by a family member perpetrator. Conclusions Short-term lost productivity represents a minimum economic valuation of the immediate negative effects of intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and stalking. Victims’ lost productivity affects family members, colleagues, and employers.

show abstract

“…Given insufficient data on age of onset and survival probabilities, this was not feasible. Thus, for nonfatal illnesses avoided, 48 We derived the productivity loss estimates from the average population estimates in Grosse, Krueger, and Mvundura, 2009, which also applies a 3-percent discount rate to all future production. 49 These estimates do not include the costs associated with overtime and labor replacement costs, such as the cost of training new hires.…”

Section: Step 5: Monetize Avoided Injuries Illnesses and Fatalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the Economic Benefit Associated with Research and Services at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: An Approach and Three Case Studies

Miller¹,

Metz²,

Smith³

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Limited Print and Electronic Distribution RightsThis document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2256Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND CorporationR® is a registered trademark.iii Preface This report presents and illustrates an approach for estimating economic benefit of research and services at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), using three case studies. Although no set of three case studies can be regarded as fully representative, we selected the cases to represent important variations in NIOSH activities and intended audiences. The report might be of interest to anyone seeking to understand the impacts of research, services, and practice related to worker safety and health. RAND Corporation researchers have published the following related reports:• Eric Landree, Hirokazu Miyake, and Victoria Greenfield, Nanomaterial Safety in RAND Infrastructure Resilience and Environmental PolicyThe research reported here was conducted in the RAND Infrastructure Resilience and Environmental Policy program, which performs analyses on urbanization and other stresses. This includes research on infrastructure development; infrastructure financing; energy policy; urban planning and the role of public-private partnerships; transportation policy; climate response, mitigation, and adaptation; environmental sustainability; and water resource management and coastal protection. Program research is supported by government agencies, foundations, and the private sector.RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment (JIE) conducts research and analysis in civil and criminal justice, infrastructure development and financing, environmental policy, transportation planning and technology, immigration and border protection, public and occupational safety, energy policy, science and innovation policy, space, telecommunications, and trends and implications of artificial intelligence and other computational technologies.Questions or comments about this r...

show abstract

Economic Productivity by Age and Sex

Abstract: Changes in hours of paid employment and household services can affect economic productivity by age and sex. This is the first publication to include estimates of household services based on contemporary time use data for the US population.

Cited by 107 publications

References 19 publications

Healthcare utilization and cost of pneumococcal disease in the United States

Healthcare utilization and cost of pneumococcal disease in the United States

Short-term Lost Productivity per Victim: Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Violence, or Stalking

Understanding the Economic Benefit Associated with Research and Services at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: An Approach and Three Case Studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About