Economic policy for country’s digitalization: a case study

Development features of peasant household of some Russian provinces during World War I are described in the paper. World War I had a great impact on Russian agriculture. Military recruitment, requisition of horses and cattle, lack of agricultural tools, machines and fertilizers, transport difficulties had a negative impact on agriculture. About 7.5 million people were taken from agriculture in the first year of war. About 6 million of people were called on military service in the second and third year. As a result, a large number of households were without male work power. Women, old men and teenagers had a major role in agriculture due to a lack of male work power. Agriculture lost a great number of horses. They were taken into the army. 3167 thousand of horses were in the army according to records for September 1, 1917. This is 10% of all livestock of horses in the country. A large number of cattle were confiscated during the war. This had a great impact on agriculture of the southern and western provinces. A great requisition was in middle-class households and in poor households. However, despite a number of negative economic factors connected with the war, country economy had necessary human resources, material and technical resources, showing steady increase in work productivity and crop yield. Political events of critical period in the history of Russia in the beginning of the 20th century showed that the country was dependent on the peasantry. It was because the peasantry was the majority of population. Rural and army support played a great role in a victory of the Left in revolutionary events of 1917 and the subsequent Civil war. Agrarian revolution showed that Russian peasantry resolved complex problems of agrarian development by confiscatory and distributive actions. It was called «Black Repartition» in Russia.

“…There was an increase in prices for bread and other products. Increase in prices for bread affected poor people greatly [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic Aspects of the Development of Peasant Household in Russia During the World War I

Kolupaev*,

Gali,

Konteva

et al. 2019

“…. In the implementation of programs, the state usually plays the leading role, since the need for rapid concentration of significant resources, the complexity of the problem and the uncertainty of economic efficiency make direct regulation expedient with the supporting role of market-based instruments (Ponomareva et al, 2019;Ivanova, et al, 2019;Plaskova et al, 2017). In Russia, federal targeted programs are necessary for the rehabilitation of ecological disaster zones, the protection of especially valuable natural objects (Lake Baikal, river systems, sea basins), and the fulfillment of international obligations (protection of the ozone layer, greenhouse gases, biodiversity conservation).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovative And Environmental Aspects Of State Regulation Of Environmental Management

Kozlov*,

Goncharov,

Malinichev

et al. 2019

The development of agriculture over the past 100 years has often led and leads to a deterioration of the natural environment, and intensive nature management turns into the destruction of nature, the fundamental basis for the development of agricultural economics. Powerful tractors, multi-tonnage harvesting and transport vehicles compact the soil, as a result of which it loses its natural fertility. Plowing the soil, aiming at moving the seeds of weed plants into the deep layers to weaken their competition with the seeds of cultivated plants, planted relatively close to the field surface, often leads to easy deflection of the upper layer, dust storms. In the United States and Canada, this phenomenon was observed in the mid 30s. last century, in other countries - in the middle of the twentieth century. In Russia, dust storms occurred in the 60s. after plowing virgin and fallow lands.

“…For Russia, it is necessary to ensure that the provision on such donation is recorded in international agreements governing the solution of global environmental and climate problems [57][58][59][60][61]. Therefore, a fundamental and correct step by Russia, in the context of implementing decisions taken by the Cancun Conference on a mechanism to compensate developing countries for their costs of saving tropical forests, is to link their own intentions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 15-25% by 2020 with the obligations of the international community the contribution of Russian forests to the reduction of technogenic emissions of these gases, as well as with the obligations of the countries -the main sources of emissions for their comparable reduction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of the Resource Factor in the Socio-Economic Development of the Ecosystem

Nosov*,

Moiseeva,

Kiseleva

et al. 2019

The article considers nature as an economic good, its role as a resource factor in socio-economic development. First of all, it should be emphasized that the living and inanimate nature is the habitat, living space of a person. Without water and air, with excessive solar radiation due to the ozone layer or with excess cold due to greenhouse gases, human activity ceases much faster than in the absence of essential goods. Therefore, the value of natural conditions as a means of survival and development of the human community has an undisputed priority over other benefits and values. The life of any person is inextricably linked with nature, nature plays a role in shaping the quality of life and the spiritual wealth of society