Economic feasibility of bifacial silicon solar cells

Abstract

Bifacial solar cells and modules are a promising approach to increase the energy output of photovoltaic systems, and therefore decrease levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). This work discusses the bifacial silicon solar cell concepts PERT (passivated emitter, rear totally diffused) and BOSCO (both sides collecting and contacted) in terms of expected module cost and LCOE based on in-depth numerical device simulation and advanced cost modelling. As references, Al-BSF (aluminium back-surface field) and PERC (passivated emitter and rear) cells with local rear-side contacts are considered. In order to exploit their bifacial potential, PERT structures (representing cells with single-sided emitter) are shown to require bulk diffusion lengths of more than three times the cell thickness. For the BOSCO concept (representing cells with double-sided emitter), diffusion lengths of half the cell thickness are sufficient to leverage its bifacial potential. In terms of nominal LCOE, BOSCO cells are shown to be cost-competitive under monofacial operation compared with an 18% efficient (≙ pMPP = 18 mW/cm2) multicrystalline silicon (mc-Si) Al-BSF cell and a 19% mc-Si PERC cell for maximum output power densities of pMPP ≥ 17.3 mW/cm2 and pMPP ≥ 18.1 mW/cm2, respectively. These values assume the use of $10/kg silicon feedstock for the BOSCO and $20/kg for the Al-BSF and PERC cells. For the PERT cell, corresponding values are pMPP ≥ 21.7 mW/cm2 and pMPP ≥ 22.7 mW/cm2, respectively, assuming the current price offset (≈50%, at the time of October 2014) of n-type Czochralski-grown silicon (Cz-Si) compared with mc-Si wafers. The material price offset of n-type to p-type Cz-Si wafers (≈15%, October 2014) currently accounts for approximately 1 mW/cm2, which correlates to a conversion efficiency difference of 1%abs for monofacial illumination with 1 sun. From p-type mc-Si to p-type Cz-Si (≈30% wafer price offset, October 2014), this offset is approximately 2.5 mW/cm2 for a PERT cell. When utilizing bifacial operation, these required maximum output power densities can be transformed into required minimum rear-side illumination intensities for arbitrary front-side efficiencies ηfront by means of the performed numerical simulations. For a BOSCO cell with ηfront = 18%, minimum rear-side illumination intensities of ≤ 0.02 suns are required to match a 19% PERC cell in terms of nominal LCOE. For an n-type Cz-Si PERT cell with ηfront = 21%, corresponding values are ≤ 0.11 suns with 0.05 suns being the n-type to p-type material price offset. This work strongly motivates the use of bifacial concepts to generate lowest LCOE

Bifacial shingle solar cells on p-type Cz-Si (pSPEER)

“…[20]). The IV measurements of the singulated pSPEER cells are performed using a cell tester calibrated with pSPEER cells measured at Fraunhofer ISE CalLab PV Cells.…”

Minimising the levelised cost of electricity for bifacial solar panel arrays using Bayesian optimisation

“…11 The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is a very relevant economic metric of a solar power plant. 12 The performance of bifacial solar modules is heavily affected by their surroundings, because they can accept light from almost every direction. Hence, a vast amount of parameters influence the resulting LCOE, for example the module and land costs, module distance and inclination angle, albedo of the ground, geographical position and the weather conditions at the location of the solar farm.…”

A worldwide cost-based design and optimization of tilted bifacial solar farms

“…A recent literature review by Guerrero-Lemus et al [15] explains the optimism surrounding the initiation, growth, and scalability of this technology. To this end, various standalone module designs have been recently investigated numerically [16][17][18][19][20] and experimentally [21][22][23][24]. These demonstrate the dependence of irradiance intensity, spectral distribution, the fraction of direct, diffuse, and albedo light, etc.…”