Economic Evaluations of Child Nutrition Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal

Abstract

Economic evaluation is crucial for cost-effective resource allocation to improve child nutrition in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the quality of published economic evaluations in these settings is not well understood. This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of existing economic evaluations of child nutrition interventions in LMICs and synthesize the study characteristics and economic evidence. We searched 9 electronic databases, including MEDLINE, with the following concepts: economic evaluation, children, nutrition, and LMICs. All types of interventions addressing malnutrition, including stunting, wasting, micronutrient deficiency, and overweight, were identified. We included economic evaluations that examined both costs and effects published in English peer-reviewed journals and used the Drummond checklist for quality appraisal. We present findings through a narrative synthesis. Sixty-nine studies with diverse settings, perspectives, time horizons, and outcome measures were included. Most studies used data from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia and addressed undernutrition. The mortality rate, intervention effect, intervention coverage, cost, and discount rate were reported as predictors among studies that performed sensitivity analyses. Despite the heterogeneity of included studies and the possibility of publication bias, 81% of included studies concluded that nutrition interventions were cost-effective or cost-beneficial, mostly based on a country's cost-effectiveness thresholds. Regarding quality assessment, the studies published after 2016 met more criteria than studies published before 2016. Most studies had well-stated research questions, forms of economic evaluation, interventions, and conclusions. However, reporting the perspective of the analyses, justification of discount rates, and describing the role of funders and ethics approval were identified as areas needing improvement. The gaps in the quality of reporting could be improved by consolidated guidance on the publication of economic evaluations and the use of appropriate quality appraisal checklists. Strengthening the evidence base for child malnutrition across different regions is necessary to inform cost-effective investment in LMICs. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42020194445.

Quality and fragility of meta-analyses assessing the efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba preparation: protocol for a methodological study

“…Therefore, the number will be provided with a percentage for each answer to help readers fully understand the quality assessment results. Second, the judgment regarding the research quality will only be based on the included publications and supplementary materials (29,30). Differences could emerge between what was reported and what was conducted by the authors; therefore, the results of methodological quality may be biased.…”

Measurement of benefits in economic evaluations of nutrition interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review

“…More importantly, interventions—particularly those from different sectors—usually have different objectives and intended proximal and distal outcomes. The heterogeneity of multisectoral programmes and their study designs, the range of benefits measured and valued, and concerns related to quality assessment have all been noted by recent systematic reviews (Baek et al, 2021; Njuguna et al, 2020; Ramponi et al, 2020).…”

“…A third recent study by Das et al (2020) provides a systematic review of both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions that manage acute malnutrition in children in LMICs. Baek et al (2021) It may not be coincidental that there are persistent evidence gaps for nutrition-sensitive interventions and multi-sectoral approaches. First, it is a substantive challenge to capture and value the diverse benefits associated with multi-sectoral strategies to improve health outcomes.…”

“…A third recent study by Das et al (2020) provides a systematic review of both the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of interventions that manage acute malnutrition in children in LMICs. Baek et al (2021) systematic review of economic evaluations of child nutrition in interventions in LMICs notes a dramatic increase in the number of published economic evaluations of child nutrition interventions between the 2000s and 2010s. Despite this increase, most of the published literature evaluates the cost‐effectiveness of nutrition‐specific interventions.…”