2015
DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2015.1009068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic development and evolving state capacities in Central and Eastern Europe: can “smart specialization” make a difference?

Abstract: We position "smart specialization" (SS) as the third external and conditionalitybased reform of economic policy rationales -after Washington Consensus and Europeanization -in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). We discuss what kind of state, policy, and administrative capacities, or routines, SS presumes. We show that over the years CEE economies have built very different routines, especially for policy coordination and public-private interactions. Design and implementation of functional SS strategies requires c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our findings suggest that policy should also account for the innovative capacity of regions, since this may be important to stimulate more unrelated diversification to avoid potential lock-in, especially in peripheral regions in the European Union where innovation capacity is low. In this respect, one could think of all kinds of policies that will address the low absorptive of companies and weak entrepreneurial capacities in peripheral regions but also institutional weaknesses like low quality of government and a poor culture of collaboration (Rodríguez-Pose, Di Cataldo, and Rainoldi 2014;Karo and Kattel 2015;McCann and Ortega-Argilés 2015;Rodríguez-Pose and Wilkie 2015;Cortinovis et al 2017). Table A2 Correlations of Main Variables…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our findings suggest that policy should also account for the innovative capacity of regions, since this may be important to stimulate more unrelated diversification to avoid potential lock-in, especially in peripheral regions in the European Union where innovation capacity is low. In this respect, one could think of all kinds of policies that will address the low absorptive of companies and weak entrepreneurial capacities in peripheral regions but also institutional weaknesses like low quality of government and a poor culture of collaboration (Rodríguez-Pose, Di Cataldo, and Rainoldi 2014;Karo and Kattel 2015;McCann and Ortega-Argilés 2015;Rodríguez-Pose and Wilkie 2015;Cortinovis et al 2017). Table A2 Correlations of Main Variables…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following other analyses of innovation policy path-dependent trajectories and capacities in comparable contexts (Valdaliso et al, 2014;Karo & Kattel, 2015;Karo & Looga, 2016), one avenue of future research could hypothesize that Scotland has bought into the development of regional competitive advantage earlier, whilst Slovenia had limited exposure to these policies prior to entering the EU (in 2004). Hence, it has not established a strong position on constructing regional competitive advantage and was more easily persuaded into the merits of niche specialization through entrepreneurial discovery as proposed through the S3 policy (Karo et al, 2017;Bučar & Rissola, 2018).…”
Section: The Fundamentals: Cultural and Political Differences In Apprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart Specialisation has become ex-ante conditionality for the EU regional and cohesion policy (Karo, Kettel, 2015). In the context of industrial policy, Smart Specialization approach could be considered as a continuation of horizontal approach of industrial strategy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%