Economic and Health State Utility Determinations for Schizophrenic Patients Treated With Risperidone or Haloperidol

Abstract

The current study uses utility analysis to assess economic and quality-of-life benefits of risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia. A retrospective analysis was performed on Positive and Negative Syndrome Symptoms (PANSS) data obtained from the published Canadian multicenter risperidone trial (part of the North American trial). Cluster analysis applied to endpoint PANSS scores, including all patients (N = 135), identified three clusters representing 130 patients with mild, moderate, and severe symptomatology. A narrative health state profile was written for each cluster, and 100 psychiatric nurses from Washington, DC, were asked to assign preference ratings to each one using linear analog and standard gamble (SG) methods. Mean utility values (confidence interval 95%) obtained from the SG ratings for the three health state profiles were 0.61 +/- 0.069 (mild); 0.36 +/- 0.073 (moderate); and 0.29 +/- 0.071 (severe). The mild health state (including the majority of risperidone 6 mg-treated patients) was rated by nurses to have a 0.25 +/- 0.0501 greater utility than the moderate health state (composed of the majority of haloperidol-treated patients). The results of these utility evaluations (SG) by the nurses were related to the clinical outcome for three of the six drug treatment groups (N = 65) by multiplying the percentage of patients in each of the three clusters, both at baseline and end-point, who were receiving risperidone 6 mg/day, haloperidol, or placebo, by the utility value for the health state assigned to that cluster. The gain in utility for risperidone-treated patients was 2.6 times higher (0.125) compared with haloperidol-treated patients (0.049), and 7 times higher compared with placebo (-0.021). After multiplying the gain in utility of each treatment by the remaining expected life span for men and women, it was found that risperidone-treated patients obtained more than twice as many quality-adjusted years as haloperidol patients. The incremental drug treatment cost divided by the incremental benefit of risperidone versus haloperidol was found to yield a favorable, generally accepted cost-utility ratio.

HIV transmission and the cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance

“…Individuals who are addicted to heroin likely have comorbid psychiatric disorders, including depression, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, and other mental illnesses, [119][120][121] and comorbid medical diseases, including hepatitis, soft tissue infections, and many other diseases. 122,123 Quality adjustments have been estimated to be 0.45 for depression, 124 0.61 for mild schizophrenia, 125 and 0.29 for severe chronic schizophrenia. 125 These values are significantly lower than the quality adjustments that we made for injection drug use.…”

“…122,123 Quality adjustments have been estimated to be 0.45 for depression, 124 0.61 for mild schizophrenia, 125 and 0.29 for severe chronic schizophrenia. 125 These values are significantly lower than the quality adjustments that we made for injection drug use. Future work on the cost-effectiveness of substance abuse treatment will benefit from an improved estimate of the quality adjustment for injection drug use.…”

Structural neuroimaging in psychosis: a systematic review and economic evaluation

“…Utility scores can only be derived from SF-36/12 scores when fully disaggregated scores are reported, so five of the nine papers are not useful as only aggregated SF-36/12 scores are provided. Four papers report utility values for patients with schizophrenia 117,[119][120][121] and two of these report values for a treated and untreated state. 120,121 Three of the four papers report patient-rated values whereas the other 117 used psychiatric nurses to rate preferences.…”

Risperidone: Refining the Tools to Treat Schizophrenia

“…One research group took a more novel approach to the cost-effectiveness issue, incorporating data from the North American Risperidone Trial into a cost-utility analysis (9). The apparent quality of life for enrolled subjects was estimated at baseline and endpoint (6 weeks) from symptom clusters presented to 100 psychiatric nurses.…”