Economic analysis of bioethanol and electricity production from sugarcane in South Africa

Abstract

An economic analysis for ethanol and electricity production in the sugarcane crushing industry in South Africa through first‐ and second‐generation technologies, and integration strategies was carried out. The analysis included capital allowances to upgrade the energy efficiencies of existing sugar mills, to allow co‐production of electricity, production of second‐generation ethanol from hemicellulose, and export of lignocellulose residues from these facilities. Methodologies included mass and energy balances in Aspen Plus® and economic models in MS Excel to determine the required selling prices for electricity, sugarcane residues and ethanol, for these investments. The required selling price for electricity for the sugarcane crushing industry was US$ 97/MWhr, while that of bagasse residues was US$ 90/ton. A first‐generation ethanol plant with electricity co‐generation from bagasse has an ethanol selling price of US$ 0.84/l, which was highly dependent of the cane price, and reduced significantly when second‐generation production from hemicelluloses of bagasse and trash was incorporated. The selling price of US$ 0.38/l for integrated second‐generation ethanol at a sugar mill was the lowest, but however, was highly dependent on technological efficiency. Standalone second‐generation ethanol was unfeasible due to the costs of the infrastructure needed to provide bagasse as a ­feedstock. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Comparison of recovery of volatile fatty acids and mixed ketones as alternative downstream processes for acetogenisis fermentation

“…This represents the most optimistic pricing scheme that will result in the most optimistic economic outcome. IRR‐2: based on the market values of acetone and acetic acid with an incentive, as these are considered to be the simplest chemicals in the ketone and VFA groups, respectively. The incentive of 25% that the quoted price of electricity in Table had over the fossil value of electricity applies to the market values of acetone and acetic acid.…”

Comparison of immobilized and free enzyme systems in industrial production of short‐chain fructooligosaccharides from sucrose using a techno‐economic approach

“…A refinery that uses carbohydrates and sugars primarily containing glucose, fructose, xylose, and sucrose for the production of biofuels and biochemicals through a biorefinery is known as a first‐generation (1G) biorefinery. However, there have been concerns about competition with food production industries for the use of the biomass and arable lands . Second‐generation (2G) biorefineries are a more challenging biorefinery approach, which consists of the conversion of biomass and waste material to a variety of bio‐based products …”

Synergism of cellulases and amylolytic enzymes in the hydrolysis of microalgal carbohydrates

“…Both the increase in world's energy consumption and the reduction in available oil have led to a search for alternative energy resources, especially those derived from renewable materials such as biomass and bioethanol . The feedstock for bioethanol production can consist of sucrose (e.g., sugarcane, sugar beet), starch (e.g., corn, wheat), or lignocellulosic materials .…”

“…B oth the increase in world's energy consumption and the reduction in available oil have led to a search for alternative energy resources, especially those derived from renewable materials such as biomass and bioethanol. 1,2 The feedstock for bioethanol production can consist of sucrose (e.g., sugarcane, sugar beet), starch (e.g., corn, wheat), or lignocellulosic materials. 3,4 Agricultural materials such as starch, corn, rice, wheat, sugar cane, sugar beet, and sweet sorghum are not preferred for bioethanol production as they are required for human consumption as food.…”