2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Econometric perspective of the energy consumption and economic growth relation in European Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[34] scrutinize the connection between natural gas and economic development in G-7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom-UK, and the USA) using a bootstrap -corrected causality test; they concluded that for the UK there is only a unidirectional causality running from economic growth to natural gas consumption while for Italy is contrary; for Germany, France, and the USA there is a bidirectional causality; for Japan and Canada, there is no any causality. [48] investigate the same correlation in Spain, Romania, and EU for the period 1990-2010, applying GC test; and they report a long-run relationship between GDP per capita and energy consumption with source natural gas for Spain and Romania; and for EU was only discovered a long-run relationship proven among GDP per capita and energy consumption with source renewable and total petroleum products. [5] examining natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus for a panel of 67 countries for the period 1992-2005, employing Pedroni panel cointegration and GC causality test, report bidirectional causality between natural gas consumption and economic growth in both short and longrun.…”
Section: Specific Country Data Analysis Vs Panel Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[34] scrutinize the connection between natural gas and economic development in G-7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom-UK, and the USA) using a bootstrap -corrected causality test; they concluded that for the UK there is only a unidirectional causality running from economic growth to natural gas consumption while for Italy is contrary; for Germany, France, and the USA there is a bidirectional causality; for Japan and Canada, there is no any causality. [48] investigate the same correlation in Spain, Romania, and EU for the period 1990-2010, applying GC test; and they report a long-run relationship between GDP per capita and energy consumption with source natural gas for Spain and Romania; and for EU was only discovered a long-run relationship proven among GDP per capita and energy consumption with source renewable and total petroleum products. [5] examining natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus for a panel of 67 countries for the period 1992-2005, employing Pedroni panel cointegration and GC causality test, report bidirectional causality between natural gas consumption and economic growth in both short and longrun.…”
Section: Specific Country Data Analysis Vs Panel Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This study follows a two-step approach: first times series data is inspected if it has unit root using Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test, which is the most extensively used test among researchers because of its simplicity [54]. ADF test null hypothesis supports the existence of unit root, and the probability of obtaining nonstationary series is high, therefore we shall have to test again but on the first difference which would change the series integrated of order 1 I(1); and if the series remain nonstationary we will have to apply second differences, which would transform the original series in I(2), or integrated two times [48]. Second, Error Correction Model (ECM) is employed to check dynamic relationship among variables because data is both integrated and stationary and this model can better estimate short and long-run effects and also it is easy for interpretation [51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the current state and forecasting the future state of the energy sector are some of the key components of forming a long-term policy of sustainable economic development (Pirlogea and Cicea 2012). The nexus of energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental protection is an important factor in this respect (Omri 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of different economies, researchers around the world have tried to find the truth about the factors which impact on economic growth. Over the years, key concepts have been analyzed with the aim to explain their effects on variability of growth (Pirlogea and Cicea, 2012). From the theoretical point of view, unidirectional, bidirectional and neutrality approaches have prevailed in the latest studies (Adewuyi and Adeniyi, 2015;Ahmed and Azam, 2016;Balitskiy et al, 2016;Ee, 2016;Mutascu, 2016;Saidi and Hammami, 2015;Shahzad et al, 2017;Trost and Bojnec, 2015) examining the relationships among energy consumption, export and economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that these three types of approaches within the scientific literature may be due to the selections of the countries, data time spans, empirical econometric model settings or other explanatory variable selections (Chen et al, 2016). Moreover, it is worth noting that energy consumption has been a relatively new factor seen as a driving force of economic growth that has not been included in the growth models (Pirlogea and Cicea, 2012). Trade openness is an important factor of economic growth and the increase in export promotes the economic activities and the energy demand (Sadorsky, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%