2017
DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-27-49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Econometric estimation of the impact of oil prices shock on the Russian economy in VECM model

Abstract: The paper estimates terms of trade shock influence on the Russian output, gross investment and consumption using VECM model with exogenous variables. As a proxy for terms of trade we use oil prices. Empirical results demonstrate that a permanent oil price increase led to a short-run economic boom followed by a negative contribution to economic growth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multipliers are calculated for oil prices for the variables of interest under the model with a common long-run growth rate, and are presented in Table 3. The 0.09 estimate for long-run oil price elasticity of GDP is similar to the 0.1 observed in domestic papers by Polbin and Skrobotov (2016) and Polbin (2017b). Papers by Rautava (2004), Beck et al (2007), and Kuboniwa (2014) produce an oil price elasticity of GDP of 0.2, which is significantly higher than our estimate.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Multipliers are calculated for oil prices for the variables of interest under the model with a common long-run growth rate, and are presented in Table 3. The 0.09 estimate for long-run oil price elasticity of GDP is similar to the 0.1 observed in domestic papers by Polbin and Skrobotov (2016) and Polbin (2017b). Papers by Rautava (2004), Beck et al (2007), and Kuboniwa (2014) produce an oil price elasticity of GDP of 0.2, which is significantly higher than our estimate.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Increased export income leads to increased consumption, investments, and GDP (Malakhovskaya and Minabutdinov, 2013). The results of a study by Polbin (2017) demonstrate that, contrary to the traditional opinion, growth of oil prices leads to growth of gross production only in the short term (2-2.5 years), while in the mid term, this correlation becomes negative.…”
Section: Literature Review On the Correlation Between The Commodity Amentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We also assessed the sensitivity of Russia's financial cycle parameters during a period of relatively homogeneous monetary policy (Polbin, 2017;Pestova, 2017): before the adoption of the inflation targeting (IT) regime in November 2014 (Figure 2). Assessment of empirical data in the January 2004-November 2014 period indicates a higher oil price elasticity for most lending indicators (the key credit risk indicators out of those in Table 2 are assessed), including the foreign currency predominance ratios, as compared to the elasticity of the same indicators over the entire assessment horizon (2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017).…”
Section: Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific search's main objective was to justify state oil purchase as the main factor in improving the Russian oil exchange market liquidity at the present stage of its development. The paper of (Polbin, 2017) estimates terms of trade shock influence on the Russian output, gross investment, and consumption using VECM model with exogenous variables. Empirical results demonstrate that a permanent oil price increase led to a short-run economic boom followed by a negative contribution to economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%