2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-236429/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecology, Seasonality and Host Preferences of Austrian Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) Mascittii Grassi, 1908, Populations

Abstract: Background: Sand flies are principal vectors of the protozoan parasites Leishmania spp., widely distributed in all warmer regions of the world, including the Mediterranean parts of Europe. In Central European countries, the sand fly fauna is still understudied. Phlebotomus mascittii, a suspected but unproven vector of Leishmania infantum, is regarded as the most widely distributed species in Europe. However, many aspects of its biology and ecology remain poorly known. The aim of this study was to provide new d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…infantum due to circumstantial findings of parasite DNA by PCR screening [ 106 ]. This species (Figs 45 and 46 ) exhibits a wide distribution in Europe that extends the usual Mediterranean regions to the north up to Austria, Germany, and Slovakia [ 107 – 109 ]. In the Maghreb region, its presence was recorded by a sole finding of 1 female in Tizi Ouzou, Algeria ( Fig 47 ) in the humid bioclimatic zone [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…infantum due to circumstantial findings of parasite DNA by PCR screening [ 106 ]. This species (Figs 45 and 46 ) exhibits a wide distribution in Europe that extends the usual Mediterranean regions to the north up to Austria, Germany, and Slovakia [ 107 – 109 ]. In the Maghreb region, its presence was recorded by a sole finding of 1 female in Tizi Ouzou, Algeria ( Fig 47 ) in the humid bioclimatic zone [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All specimens were morphologically identified to the species level. However, most females had hardly visible spermathecae, which made morphological discrimination tricky, as noted by Kniha et al (2020). This issue might have contributed to the species being underreported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue might have contributed to the species being underreported. It is therefore advisable to observe the spermathecae under different wavelengths of light (Kniha et al, 2020) or dissect the abdomen, extract the spermathecae and add a staining medium. Besides, the use of the COI genetic marker for species identification confirmation has become more widely used (Praprotnik et al, 2019;Kniha et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…simonahalepae n. sp. does not overlap with any of these species [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Despite repeated efforts to sample more specimens, no other individual from the newly described species was captured (authors' unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 6 The currently known distribution areas of species of subgenus Transphlebotomus [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] anatolicus by the number of prolongations of the knob of the spermathecae (9 vs. 10-12), the presence of the neck as well as morphometry of the head structures [10]; from Ph. mascittii the morphological differences refer to the aspect of the knob of the spermathecae, number of prolongations (9 vs. 10-12), and the presence of the neck and the size of labrum [9]; from Ph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%