2012
DOI: 10.1891/0889-8391.26.4.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention in Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Novel Approach to Treatment

Abstract: This study provides an introduction to ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods and the potential use of ecological momentary intervention (EMI) for nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). The novel use of EMA and EMI are discussed within the context of the emotion regulation function of NSSI, the ability of these approaches to complement established treatments (i.e., cognitive behavior therapy & dialectical behavior therapy), and the specific areas in which an EMI treatment approach can augment traditional treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have demonstrated clear emotional precipitants (e.g. increased negative affect and anger) to increases in SI and self-harm behavior (Armey, 2012;Armey, Crowther, & Miller, 2011;Armey, Nugent, & Crowther, 2012;Armey, Schatten, Haradhvala, & Miller, 2015;Nock, Prinstein, & Sterba, 2009), with some indication that the inclusion of EMA methods incrementally improves our ability to predict episodes of selfharm above and beyond distal, retrospective, self-reports (Armey, 2012). In addition, this research suggests that changes in negative affect were detectable hours before the event, which has obvious implications for early intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have demonstrated clear emotional precipitants (e.g. increased negative affect and anger) to increases in SI and self-harm behavior (Armey, 2012;Armey, Crowther, & Miller, 2011;Armey, Nugent, & Crowther, 2012;Armey, Schatten, Haradhvala, & Miller, 2015;Nock, Prinstein, & Sterba, 2009), with some indication that the inclusion of EMA methods incrementally improves our ability to predict episodes of selfharm above and beyond distal, retrospective, self-reports (Armey, 2012). In addition, this research suggests that changes in negative affect were detectable hours before the event, which has obvious implications for early intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This finding is also consistent with the need to build ecologically valid predictive models of suicide risk using idiographic data from individual patients, rather than relying solely on population-level predictors. Past research has already found that EMA measures contribute unique variance above and beyond that of traditional retrospective self-report measures of life history, traits, or personality measures (Armey, 2012). While we believe that these traditional measures are still vitally important, and play a foundational role in suicide prediction, it may be the case that if the ultimate goal is to predict episodic risk and/or behavior, it will be essential to employ ecologically valid measures in future research and intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This implies that, in most instances, there will be a brief window of opportunity to intervene and interrupt the transition to behavioral action. Ecological momentary interventions using mobile devices might have particular merit in this context (22,72,73), as these can be delivered when people report experiencing NSSI thoughts, and facilitate relapse prevention techniques. In line with the Cognitive-Emotional Model of NSSI (23), we found evidence that low self-efficacy to resist NSSI may be particularly relevant in identifying high-risk situations among people experiencing NSSI thoughts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, studies have employed EMA methods to study this behavior, allowing for the identification of proximal (i.e, EMA) and distal (i.e., self-report) factors that influence NSSI engagement [34]. …”
Section: Non-suicidal Self-injurymentioning
confidence: 99%