2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecologically assessed affect and suicidal ideation following psychiatric inpatient hospitalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(69 reference statements)
8
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, rates of survey completion were modest though comparable to previous reports in similar samples (e.g. Armey, Brick, Schatten, Nugent, & Miller, 2018). Second, the brief assessments used in this study could not capture important variables (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, rates of survey completion were modest though comparable to previous reports in similar samples (e.g. Armey, Brick, Schatten, Nugent, & Miller, 2018). Second, the brief assessments used in this study could not capture important variables (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We then train a model to accurately predict a set of emotion measures, despite restrictive real-world conditions and small amounts of data. These measures were found to be indicative of suicidal ideation in prior work [13]. Finally, we show how emotion predicted from speech can be used to separate healthy controls from those with recent suicidal ideation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In these surveys, participants were asked to report on their current affect, using items from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-X) [16]. Affect was rated on a five point Likert Scale for 11 different categories, which are divided into three groups, based on previous work [13]. The three groups are: (1) Positive Emotion -Confident, Excited, Happy; (2) Negative Emotion -Sad, Guilty, Worried, Shame, Hopeless; (3) Anger/Irritability -Anger at Others, Anger at Self, and Irritable.…”
Section: The Emass Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This capacity permits the characterization of suicidal phenotypes (18) distinguished by temporal variability (e.g., ideation chronicity versus lability; cyclicity (140)). Moreover, its naturalistic administration facilitates examination of the complex interplay between proximal factors as suicidality evolves (141,142).…”
Section: Intensive Proximal Risk Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%