Ecological Integrity Evaluation of Organically Evolved Cultural Landscape

Abstract

When the traditional method is used to evaluate the cultural landscape as a whole, due to the lack of historical and cultural factors, the impact of the ecological environment on the landscape change is not considered. Therefore, it cannot objectively reflect the law of landscape change. Therefore, from the perspective of the combination of cultural landscape composition characteristics and cultural ecological characteristics, this paper puts forward the concept of cultural ecological integrity based on the existing concept of cultural heritage integrity, aiming at the organic evolution of cultural landscape in cultural landscape heritage, and expounded the dynamic sustainability and effectiveness of natural environment and social environment on the process of cultural landscape. Considering the relevant characteristics and different forms of cultural landscape and cultural ecological integrity, according to the concept of cultural ecological integrity, this paper gave the principles and standards of cultural landscape ecological integrity evaluation and put forward the evaluation method of cultural ecological integrity. At the same time, each index in the ecological integrity evaluation model was decomposed and explained. Finally, taking the cultural heritage of Long-men Grottoes as an example, the paper used the cultural and ecological integrity evaluation model proposed in this paper to evaluate the material cultural landscape, intangible cultural landscape, and local traditional dwellings of Long-men Grottoes and made a comparative analysis between the control group and the observation group. The results showed that the cultural landscape ecological integrity evaluation model proposed in this paper can not only objectively evaluate the cultural landscape but also provide a certain theoretical and practical reference for the effective classification, protection and sustainable development, and utilization of the subsequent cultural landscape.

Culture and Leadership in the Collective and Sustainable Growth of an Organization

“…This culture does not welcome new ideas or methods of doing things in any manner. [12] Organic culture is contrast: It is not acceptable to maintain departmental silos, adhere to government-mandated rules, or rely on existing communication routes. We put a high value on getting things done, being able to collaborate effectively, and maintaining open channels of communication, both formally and informally.…”

Digital Reconstruction of Historical Cultural Landscapes Based on Image Recognition Technology

“…Historical cultural landscapes not only testify to the development of human civilization but are also an integral part of cultural heritage. However, over time, natural disasters, human activities, and other factors continue to threaten these valuable cultural heritages [3][4][5]. To better protect and pass on historical cultural landscapes, using digital technology to reconstruct and preserve them has become an important means.…”

Characterizing Mountain Landscape Complexity: Comparison of Landscape Character Assessment in the National Parks of the United Kingdom

“…始将景观视为研究人类社会运作方式的重要 证据 [1] 。从本质上讲，文化景观是一个动态的、 不断发展的概念，包含一个地方有形和无形 的层面，如地貌、地质、人类改造的生态系 统(如水文和植被)、传统、语言和社会实 践 [2] 。因此，文化景观研究是一个探索和发现 的过程，它揭示了人、场所和时间之间错综 复杂的联系 [3] 。为了有效管理景观变化以促进 可持续发展，首先要解决的问题是如何描述 文化景观的复杂性。20世纪80年代，起源 于 英 国 的 景 观 特 征 评 估( landscape character assessment, LCA)正是这样一种景观分类和评 估的工具，近年来逐渐被包括中国在内的世 界各国引入，为管理景观变化提供了整体研 究框架和决策依据 [4] 。景观特征是使一种景观 不同于另一种景观的整体要素组合模式，评 估旨在对具有相似特征的区域进行分类和描 述 [5] 。LCA的关键在于景观类型学，即使用明 确的规则和可重复的程序在连续的景观中划 定边界，将无限变化的景观简化为适合管理 的相对同质的空间单元 [6] 多边形表示景观特征类型和区域，并通过多 边形属性表描述划分依据、主要特征、驱动 力等信息 [7] 。 现有文献主要关注2个问题。一个是如 何减少研究人员的主观性，因为任何LCA都 必然要解决"什么是景观"这一广泛的问题， 而这一问题往往是由评估过程本身决定的 [8] 。 为了弥合自然科学与人文科学之间的鸿沟， 一些学者主张将LCA分为2个不同的组成部 分，即中立的景观特征描述，以及包含价值 判断的景观评价 [9] ，并进一步将景观特征描述 分解为按自然、文化和视觉维度顺序排列的 几个步骤 [10] 。这种基于步骤程序的探索旨在提 高过程的透明度，而不是追求标准化和客观 化 [11] 。另一个是如何揭示景观变化的本质，目…”